GreenhouseThe Orchestrated Hiring Ecosystem for the AI era
vs
LoxoThe AI recruiting platform for scaling firms
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3
Greenhouse vs Loxo
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Greenhouse is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 38.5 versus 1.9 for Loxo, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Greenhouse if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (38.5 vs 1.9)
- AI answers describe it more positively (56% vs 17% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO 27001:2022 or ISO 27701:2019 or ISO 42001:2023 or GDPR or CCPA/CPRA or PCI DSS coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
Choose Loxo if…
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
- 7-day free trial
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Greenhouse | Loxo |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 38.5% | 1.9% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #1 | #40 |
| Share of voice | 8.1% | 0.9% |
| Mentions this run | 43 | 5 |
| Positive in AI answers | 56% | 17% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Greenhouse 0pp · Loxo 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Greenhouse leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
GreenhouseLoxo
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
1Greenhouse ranked higher
0Loxo ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Greenhouse | Loxo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Official website of the top recruiting platform vendors | Perplexity | #1 | #15 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Greenhouse | Loxo |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Per seat |
| Entry price | Contact sales | $149 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No | No · 7-day trial |
| Integrations | — | 100+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001:2022, ISO 27701:2019, ISO 42001:2023, GDPR, CCPA/CPRA, PCI DSS | — |
| Support | — | Dedicated success team and priority support on Enterprise plans, Free migration for Core teams of 3+ seats, with guided self-serve tooling below that |
| Founded | 2012 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | New York City, NY, United States | Austin, Texas |
| Employees | 501–1,000 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Series D · $110M raised | Growth investment led by Tritium Partners · $115M raised |
| Best for | Employers that want structured, automated hiring across sourcing, interviews and the ATS, from early-stage companies to global enterprises | Scaling recruiting firms, including executive search, recruiting, staffing and RPO firms, and in-house talent teams |
Plans side by side
Loxo
Core$149per user / month, billed annually
ProfessionalCustombilled annually, contact sales for pricing
EnterpriseCustomcustom annual agreement
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Greenhouse
- Strong structured hiring and interview scorecards
- Strong reporting and data visibility
- Top ratings and popularity for enterprise and mid-market recruiting
- Integration ecosystem and unified data
- Reduces hiring bias and supports compliance
Loxo
- 7-day free trial
- High per-user pricing
- Annual-only plans paid upfront
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Greenhouse vs Loxo”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/greenhouse-vs-loxo, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.