Skip to content
SlateIndex
GreenhouseThe Orchestrated Hiring Ecosystem for the AI era
vs
RecruitBPMAI-Powered Applicant Tracking, CRM and Hiring Automation Platform for the Top Staffing Professionals
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3

Greenhouse vs RecruitBPM

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Greenhouse is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 38.5 versus 1.7 for RecruitBPM.

Choose Greenhouse if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (38.5 vs 1.7)
  • You need SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO 27001:2022 or ISO 27701:2019 or ISO 42001:2023 or CCPA/CPRA or PCI DSS coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
  • Strong structured hiring and interview scorecards

Choose RecruitBPM if…

No clear advantage in the published data.

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Greenhouse RecruitBPM
Visibility score38.5%1.7%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Recruiting#1#43
Share of voice8.1%0.4%
Mentions this run432
Positive in AI answers56%—

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3Greenhouse 39%

Greenhouse 0pp · RecruitBPM 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Greenhouse leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
43.5%
0%
AI Mode
33.5%
3.1%
Perplexity
38.3%
2%
GreenhouseRecruitBPM

Head to head in AI answers

0 engine answers name both brands

0Greenhouse ranked higher
0RecruitBPM ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionGreenhouseRecruitBPM
Pricing modelFlat tiersFlat tiers
Entry priceContact sales$29 / mo
Free planNoNo
Deployment—Cloud-based
Integrations—200+
ComplianceSOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001:2022, ISO 27701:2019, ISO 42001:2023, GDPR, CCPA/CPRA, PCI DSSGDPR
Support—Account manager and technical team training after subscription, Video training, Built-in knowledgebase, Email support at support@recruitbpm.com
Founded20122012
HeadquartersNew York City, NY, United StatesEden Prairie, MN, United States
Employees501–1,00011–50
FundingSeries D · $110M raised—
Best forEmployers that want structured, automated hiring across sourcing, interviews and the ATS, from early-stage companies to global enterprisesStaffing and recruitment firms

Plans side by side

Greenhouse

CoreCustom
PlusCustom
ProCustom
Greenhouse pricing

RecruitBPM

Staffing Agency Premium (monthly billing)$89user/month billed monthly
Staffing Agency Premium (annual billing)$59user/month billed annually
Essential (annual billing, lower price set)$29month
Premium (annual billing, lower price set)$69month
Enterprise (annual billing, lower price set)$169month
Essential (monthly billing, higher price set)$39month
Premium (monthly billing, higher price set)$99month
Enterprise (monthly billing, higher price set)$199month
RecruitBPM pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Greenhouse

  • Strong structured hiring and interview scorecards
  • Strong reporting and data visibility
  • Top ratings and popularity for enterprise and mid-market recruiting
  • Integration ecosystem and unified data
  • Reduces hiring bias and supports compliance

    RecruitBPM

    Profile in progress.

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “Greenhouse vs RecruitBPM”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/greenhouse-vs-recruitbpm, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.