Guru vs XWiki

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Guru is the stronger AI pick in Knowledge Management: it has a visibility score of 29.9 versus 0.3 for XWiki, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.

Choose Guru if…

You want the brand AI engines rank higher (29.9 vs 0.3)
AI answers describe it more positively (56% vs 0% positive)
You need SOC 2 Type II or HIPAA or GxP or GDPR or EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework or Swiss-U.S. Data Privacy Framework or Microsoft 365 Certification or Google CASA coverage
Verified, trusted company knowledge

Choose XWiki if…

No clear advantage in the published data.

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric	Guru	XWiki
Visibility score	29.9%	0.3%
Change vs last week	New	New
Rank in Knowledge Management	#3	#48
Share of voice	8%	0.2%
Mentions this run	43	1
Positive in AI answers	56%	0%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

Guru 0pp · XWiki 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Guru leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT

34.1%

0.9%

AI Mode

29.3%

Perplexity

26.5%

GuruXWiki

Head to head in AI answers

1 engine answers name both brands

1Guru ranked higher

0XWiki ranked higher

Prompt	Engine	Guru	XWiki
Official website of the top knowledge management tool vendors	ChatGPT	#4	#22

Features, pricing & fit

Dimension	Guru	XWiki
Pricing model	Flat tiers	—
Entry price	Contact sales	—
Free plan	No	—
Deployment	AWS-hosted cloud service	Self-hosted or on-premise, plus a managed cloud service (XWiki Cloud) and Docker images.
Integrations	100+	—
Compliance	SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA, GxP, GDPR, EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework, Swiss-U.S. Data Privacy Framework, Microsoft 365 Certification, Google CASA	—
Support	Dedicated solution engineers, AI and knowledge management strategy team, Integration setup and rollout support, Ongoing optimization reviews	Community support, Professional support
Founded	2013	2004
Headquarters	Philadelphia, Pennsylvania	Paris, France
Employees	51–200	51–200
Funding	Series C · $70M raised	NGI funding (European Commission) for the WAISE project · $0M raised
Best for	Organizations in regulated or accuracy-sensitive industries that need governed, verified knowledge for both staff and AI tools.	Organisations that need a knowledge base, collaborative intranet, public website or business applications built inside a wiki.