HarvestEveryone's time is valuable. We help teams spend it wisely.
vs
LinearThe product development system for teams and agents
Comparison · Project Management · weekly run Nov 3
Harvest vs Linear
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Linear is the stronger AI pick in Project Management: it has a visibility score of 7.9 versus 2.7 for Harvest, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.
Choose Harvest if…
- You want a lower entry price ($9 vs $10)
- You need PCI-DSS Merchant Certificate coverage
Choose Linear if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (7.9 vs 2.7)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or GDPR or HIPAA (BAA available) or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 coverage
- Fast issue tracking for software engineering teams
- Generous free plan
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Harvest | Linear |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 2.7% | 7.9% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Project Management | #29 | #12 |
| Share of voice | 0.7% | 2% |
| Mentions this run | 4 | 11 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 54% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Harvest 0pp · Linear 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Linear leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
HarvestLinear
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
1Harvest ranked higher
0Linear ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Harvest | Linear |
|---|---|---|---|
| What should a project management tool integrate with? | ChatGPT | #6 | #13 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Harvest | Linear |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $9 per seat / mo | Free; paid from $10 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | — | Cloud-hosted SaaS; workspace data can be stored in the European Union or the United States |
| Integrations | 40+ | — |
| Compliance | PCI-DSS Merchant Certificate | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, HIPAA (BAA available), ISO/IEC 27001:2022 |
| Support | Help Center, Scheduled phone support on Teams and Enterprise plans, Dedicated Customer Success Manager on Enterprise Plus | Priority support (Enterprise plan), Account manager (Enterprise plan) |
| Founded | 2006 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | — | San Francisco, California, United States |
| Funding | Seed | Series C · $134M raised |
| Best for | Freelancers and professional services teams that bill clients by the hour, from solo users to larger teams. | Product and engineering teams that build software and want humans and AI agents working in one shared system |
Plans side by side
Harvest
Free$0forever, 1 seat
Teams$9per seat per month, billed annually
Enterprise$14per seat per month, billed annually
Enterprise PlusCustomcustom pricing
Linear
Free$0free for everyone
Basic$10per user/month, billed yearly
Business$16per user/month, billed yearly
EnterpriseCustomannual billing only
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Harvest
Profile in progress.
Linear
- Fast issue tracking for software engineering teams
- Generous free plan
- Transparent, scalable pricing tiers
- Good fit for SaaS and tech product teams
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Harvest vs Linear”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/harvest-vs-linear, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.