HarvestEveryone's time is valuable. We help teams spend it wisely.
vs
TaskadeOne prompt. One live app.
Comparison · Project Management · weekly run Nov 3
Harvest vs Taskade
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Harvest is the stronger AI pick in Project Management: it has a visibility score of 2.7 versus 0.6 for Taskade.
Choose Harvest if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (2.7 vs 0.6)
- You need PCI-DSS Merchant Certificate coverage
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
Choose Taskade if…
- You want a lower entry price ($6 vs $9)
- You need more native integrations (168+ vs 40+)
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
- Best suited for AI-native multi-agent systems
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Harvest | Taskade |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 2.7% | 0.6% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Project Management | #29 | #39 |
| Share of voice | 0.7% | 0.2% |
| Mentions this run | 4 | 1 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Harvest 0pp · Taskade 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Harvest leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
HarvestTaskade
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Harvest ranked higher
0Taskade ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Harvest | Taskade |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $9 per seat / mo | Free; paid from $6 / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | — | Cloud-hosted SaaS; Taskade hosts every published app with hosting and a database included |
| Integrations | 40+ | 168+ |
| Compliance | PCI-DSS Merchant Certificate | — |
| Support | Help Center, Scheduled phone support on Teams and Enterprise plans, Dedicated Customer Success Manager on Enterprise Plus | Priority support with senior engineers (Business plan), Premium support with SLAs and onboarding (Enterprise plan) |
| Founded | 2006 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | — | San Francisco, California, United States |
| Employees | — | 11–50 |
| Funding | Seed | Seed, undisclosed, reported as led by TRAC (not confirmed by other sources) · $5M raised |
| Best for | Freelancers and professional services teams that bill clients by the hour, from solo users to larger teams. | Operators and small teams who need custom business apps such as CRMs, trackers and client portals without coding, and agencies that build for clients on the Business plan |
Plans side by side
Harvest
Free$0forever, 1 seat
Teams$9per seat per month, billed annually
Enterprise$14per seat per month, billed annually
Enterprise PlusCustomcustom pricing
Taskade
Free$0per month, billed monthly
Starter$6per month, or $72 billed yearly, 3 users
Pro$10per month, or $120 billed yearly, 10 users
Business$25per month, or $300 billed yearly, unlimited users
Max$100per month, or $1,200 billed yearly, unlimited users
EnterpriseCustomcustom, contact sales
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Harvest
Profile in progress.
Taskade
- Best suited for AI-native multi-agent systems
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Harvest vs Taskade”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/harvest-vs-taskade, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.