HeapBetter Insights. Faster.
vs
StatcounterWeb Analytics Made Easy
Comparison · Web Analytics · weekly run Nov 2
Heap vs Statcounter
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Heap is the stronger AI pick in Web Analytics: it has a visibility score of 3.3 versus 0.7 for Statcounter.
Choose Heap if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (3.3 vs 0.7)
- AI answers describe it more positively (15% vs 0% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or GDPR compliant or CCPA compliant or ISO 27001 or ISO 27701 or ISO 27017 or ISO 27018 coverage
- Automatic event capture (autocapture)
Choose Statcounter if…
- free trial without credit card required
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Heap | Statcounter |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 3.3% | 0.7% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Web Analytics | #20 | #36 |
| Share of voice | 1.8% | 0.2% |
| Mentions this run | 9 | 1 |
| Positive in AI answers | 15% | 0% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Heap 0pp · Statcounter 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Heap leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
HeapStatcounter
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Heap ranked higher
0Statcounter ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Heap | Statcounter |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Usage-based |
| Entry price | Contact sales | Free; paid from $9 / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud-based; deployment starts by installing a free tracking snippet on the site | Small tracking code snippet inserted on the website |
| Integrations | 100+ | — |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR compliant, CCPA compliant, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, ISO 27017, ISO 27018 | — |
| Support | Email support, Standard support, Dedicated customer success manager (Premier), Heap Community | Live chat support on Premium plans, FAQ, installation guides and forum, Contact form |
| Founded | — | 1999 |
| Headquarters | — | Dublin, Ireland |
| Employees | — | 1–10 |
| Funding | Series D · $205M raised | — |
| Best for | Product and growth teams that want complete user behavior data without engineering-led event tagging | Website owners and marketers who want visitor insight without analytics training |
Plans side by side
Heap
Free$0month, up to 10k monthly sessions
GrowthCustomestimate after installing snippet
ProCustomcustom session pricing
PremierCustomcustom session pricing
Statcounter
Basic$0month
Premium$9month (20,000 sessions; up to $399/mo for 5,000,000 sessions)
Premium Plus$19month (20,000 sessions; up to $499/mo for 5,000,000 sessions)
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Heap
- Automatic event capture (autocapture)
- Retroactive analysis without a predefined tracking plan
- Reduced manual instrumentation and faster implementation
- Links product analytics with UX and digital-experience analytics
- Free tier available
- Paid pricing largely quote-based, not published
- Free plan limited to about 10,000 monthly sessions
Statcounter
- free trial without credit card required
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Heap vs Statcounter”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/heap-vs-statcounter, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.