HubSpot vs Revenue.io
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
HubSpot is the stronger AI pick in Sales Engagement: it has a visibility score of 55.6 versus 0.7 for Revenue.io, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose HubSpot if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (55.6 vs 0.7)
- You want a free plan to start
- You need SOC 2 Type II or SOC 3 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (5,000+ employees)
Choose Revenue.io if…
- You need SOC 2 or HIPAA or GDPR or CCPA or TCPA or CASA Tier 2 coverage
- Blends real-time conversation intelligence into sales engagement
- Named among key revenue intelligence platforms
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | HubSpot | Revenue.io |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 55.6% | 0.7% |
| Change vs last week | up+2.3% | New |
| Rank in Sales Engagement | #1 | #37 |
| Share of voice | 11.8% | 0.4% |
| Mentions this run | 71 | 2 |
| Positive in AI answers | 35% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
HubSpot +2.3000000000000043pp · Revenue.io +0.7pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
HubSpot leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
2 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | HubSpot | Revenue.io |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which Sales Engagement vendors do analysts recommend? | ChatGPT | #4 | #8 |
| Which Sales Engagement vendors do analysts recommend? | AI Mode | #4 | #7 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | HubSpot | Revenue.io |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $7 per seat / mo | Contact sales |
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Onboarding fee | $3,000 | — |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud, native to Salesforce |
| Integrations | 2000+ | — |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3 | SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR, CCPA, TCPA, CASA Tier 2 |
| Support | Phone | Standard onboarding on all plans, Salesforce-certified implementation on Engage and Orchestrate, Dedicated success manager on Orchestrate |
| Founded | 2006 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States | Los Angeles, CA, United States |
| Employees | 5,000+ | 51–200 |
| Funding | Corporate round | Series B |
| Best for | Startups, small and mid-sized businesses and enterprises wanting marketing, sales and service on one CRM. | Sales and revenue teams of 15 or more seats that run on Salesforce and want dialing, coaching, engagement and AI in one platform. |
Plans side by side
HubSpot
Revenue.io
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
HubSpot
- intuitive, user-friendly interface
- generous free tier
- all-in-one CRM and marketing platform
- tight CRM integration for live chat and service
- good fit for startups and small businesses
- higher-tier costs and onboarding fees
- higher month-to-month pricing than annual plans
Revenue.io
- Blends real-time conversation intelligence into sales engagement
- Named among key revenue intelligence platforms
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “HubSpot vs Revenue.io”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/hubspot-vs-revenue-io, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.