Skip to content
SlateIndex
HubSpotThe agentic customer platform to scale your business.
vs
Sprout SocialTurning social into a growth engine for the world's boldest brands.
Comparison · Social Media Management · weekly run Nov 2

HubSpot vs Sprout Social

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Sprout Social is the stronger AI pick in Social Media Management: it has a visibility score of 53.5 versus 21.7 for HubSpot, and ranks ahead in 77% of the answers that name both.

Choose HubSpot if…

  • You want a free plan to start
  • You need SOC 2 Type II or SOC 3 coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (5,000+ employees)
  • intuitive, user-friendly interface

Choose Sprout Social if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (53.5 vs 21.7)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (50% vs 35% positive)
  • You need SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO 27001:2022 or ISO 27701:2019 coverage
  • Strong cross-channel analytics and reporting

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 2

Metric HubSpot Sprout Social
Visibility score21.7%53.5%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Social Media Management#5#3
Share of voice5.7%11.3%
Mentions this run3362
Positive in AI answers35%50%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2HubSpot 22%

HubSpot 0pp · Sprout Social 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Sprout Social leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
12.2%
61.3%
AI Mode
18.3%
58.3%
Perplexity
34.4%
40.7%
HubSpotSprout Social

Head to head in AI answers

26 engine answers name both brands

6HubSpot ranked higher
20Sprout Social ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionHubSpotSprout Social
Pricing modelPer seatPer seat
Entry priceFree; paid from $7 per seat / mo$79 per seat / mo
Free planYesNo · 30-day trial
Onboarding fee$3,000—
DeploymentCloudCloud-hosted on AWS
Integrations2000+—
ComplianceSOC 2 Type II, SOC 3SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001:2022, ISO 27701:2019
SupportPhonePriority customer support on the Enterprise plan, White-glove onboarding and implementation on the Enterprise plan, Professional Services add-on with trainings, strategy consultations and tag audits
Founded20062010
HeadquartersCambridge, Massachusetts, United StatesChicago, Illinois, United States
Employees5,000+1,001–5,000
FundingCorporate roundSeries B (New Enterprise Associates-led) · $104M raised
Best forStartups, small and mid-sized businesses and enterprises wanting marketing, sales and service on one CRM.Marketing and customer care teams that manage many social profiles and high engagement; the Professional plan is aimed at teams handling a lot of profiles.

Plans side by side

HubSpot

Free$0month
Starter$7month per seat (promotional, new customers; $20/mo/seat standard)
Professional$800month, includes 3 Core Seats (annual commitment; $890/mo)
Enterprise$3,600month, includes 5 Core Seats
HubSpot pricing

Sprout Social

Essentials$79seat/month (billed annually)
Standard$199seat/month (billed annually)
Professional$299seat/month (billed annually)
Advanced$399seat/month (billed annually)
EnterpriseCustomcustom
Sprout Social pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

HubSpot

  • intuitive, user-friendly interface
  • generous free tier
  • all-in-one CRM and marketing platform
  • tight CRM integration for live chat and service
  • good fit for startups and small businesses
  • higher-tier costs and onboarding fees
  • higher month-to-month pricing than annual plans

Sprout Social

  • Strong cross-channel analytics and reporting
  • Deep social listening
  • Polished user experience and unified smart inbox
  • Enterprise-grade social media management for large teams
  • Well-regarded by users with a high G2 rating
  • Costly for smaller teams and budgets

Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

Cite as: SlateIndex, “HubSpot vs Sprout Social”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/hubspot-vs-sprout-social, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.