Icertis vs Proposify
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Proposify is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 41.4 versus 3.3 for Icertis, and ranks ahead in 50% of the answers that name both.
Choose Icertis if…
- You need SOC 1 Type 2 or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 27017:2015 or ISO/IEC 27018:2019 or FedRAMP or NIST 800-171 Rev. 2 or TISAX or Cyber Essentials or Cyber Essentials Plus or ITAR or Microsoft SSPA coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
- Recognized by analysts as a powerhouse for enterprise-wide contract intelligence
- Handles complex commercial management
Choose Proposify if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (41.4 vs 3.3)
- AI answers describe it more positively (49% vs 40% positive)
- Visually rich, branded proposal design
- Robust tracking and granular proposal analytics
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Icertis | Proposify |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 3.3% | 41.4% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Proposals & Contracts | #23 | #2 |
| Share of voice | 0.9% | 9.4% |
| Mentions this run | 5 | 49 |
| Positive in AI answers | 40% | 49% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Icertis 0pp · Proposify 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Proposify leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
4 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Icertis | Proposify |
|---|---|---|---|
| Compare the leading Proposals & Contracts platforms | ChatGPT | #9 | #2 |
| Which Proposals & Contracts vendors do analysts recommend? | ChatGPT | #1 | #12 |
| Which Proposals & Contracts vendors do analysts recommend? | AI Mode | #2 | #6 |
| Official website of the top proposal and contract tool vendors | ChatGPT | #9 | #2 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Icertis | Proposify |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Per seat |
| Entry price | — | $49 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | — | No · 14-day trial |
| Deployment | Public or private cloud | Cloud-hosted SaaS |
| Compliance | SOC 1 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27017:2015, ISO/IEC 27018:2019, FedRAMP, NIST 800-171 Rev. 2, TISAX, Cyber Essentials, Cyber Essentials Plus, GDPR, ITAR, Microsoft SSPA | SOC 2 Type 2, GDPR |
| Support | — | Email and chat support, Phone and Zoom support, Dedicated success manager on Scale plan, Priority support |
| Founded | 2009 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | Bellevue, WA, United States | Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Round from existing backer B Capital, reportedly to pay down debt | Growth Equity - II (CB Insights) |
| Best for | Large global enterprises that manage high volumes of complex contracts | Busy sales teams that send proposals and quotes, such as consultants and service firms in landscaping, janitorial and construction. |
Plans side by side
Icertis
Pricing not available.
Proposify
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Icertis
- Recognized by analysts as a powerhouse for enterprise-wide contract intelligence
- Handles complex commercial management
- Named as a prominent contract lifecycle management option
- Suited to large multinational enterprises
Proposify
- Visually rich, branded proposal design
- Robust tracking and granular proposal analytics
- Well-regarded with strong user satisfaction
- Quotes and contracts with built-in approval workflows
- Discounted annual pricing lowers effective per-user cost
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Icertis vs Proposify”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/icertis-vs-proposify, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.