Icertis vs Upland Qvidian
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Icertis is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 3.3 versus 1 for Upland Qvidian, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Icertis if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (3.3 vs 1)
- AI answers describe it more positively (40% vs 0% positive)
- You need SOC 1 Type 2 or SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 27017:2015 or ISO/IEC 27018:2019 or FedRAMP or NIST 800-171 Rev. 2 or TISAX or Cyber Essentials or Cyber Essentials Plus or GDPR or ITAR or Microsoft SSPA coverage
- Recognized by analysts as a powerhouse for enterprise-wide contract intelligence
Choose Upland Qvidian if…
- You need SOC 2 Type II coverage
- Enterprise-oriented for structured proposal and RFP processes
- Recommended for formal RFPs and security questionnaires
- Suited to large-scale content reuse
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Icertis | Upland Qvidian |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 3.3% | 1% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Proposals & Contracts | #23 | #38 |
| Share of voice | 0.9% | 0.5% |
| Mentions this run | 5 | 3 |
| Positive in AI answers | 40% | 0% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Icertis 0pp · Upland Qvidian 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Icertis leads on 2 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Icertis | Upland Qvidian |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which Proposals & Contracts vendors do analysts recommend? | ChatGPT | #1 | #10 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Icertis | Upland Qvidian |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment | Public or private cloud | Cloud, hosted on Amazon Web Services |
| Compliance | SOC 1 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27017:2015, ISO/IEC 27018:2019, FedRAMP, NIST 800-171 Rev. 2, TISAX, Cyber Essentials, Cyber Essentials Plus, GDPR, ITAR, Microsoft SSPA | SOC 2 Type II |
| Founded | 2009 | — |
| Headquarters | Bellevue, WA, United States | Austin, Texas |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Round from existing backer B Capital, reportedly to pay down debt | Series B · $31M raised |
| Best for | Large global enterprises that manage high volumes of complex contracts | Sales teams that respond to RFPs and build sales proposals |
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Icertis
- Recognized by analysts as a powerhouse for enterprise-wide contract intelligence
- Handles complex commercial management
- Named as a prominent contract lifecycle management option
- Suited to large multinational enterprises
Upland Qvidian
- Enterprise-oriented for structured proposal and RFP processes
- Recommended for formal RFPs and security questionnaires
- Suited to large-scale content reuse
- Included in G2's 2026 RFP software recommendations
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Icertis vs Upland Qvidian”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/icertis-vs-upland-qvidian, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.