Skip to content
SlateIndex
InstantlyTurn leads into clients with automated outreach, a B2B lead database, email deliverability tools, and an AI-powered CRM.
vs
lemlistThe only platform you need for outbound
Comparison · Sales Engagement · weekly run Nov 3

Instantly vs lemlist

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

lemlist is the stronger AI pick in Sales Engagement: it has a visibility score of 12.9 versus 10.1 for Instantly, and ranks ahead in 75% of the answers that name both.

Choose Instantly if…

  • You want a lower entry price ($47 vs $69)
  • Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
  • Cost-effective platform for cold email outreach
  • Strong for high-volume cold email outbound and lead generation

Choose lemlist if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (12.9 vs 10.1)
  • You need more native integrations (58+ vs 50+)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (34% vs 28% positive)
  • You need SOC 2 Type II or GDPR or CCPA coverage

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Instantly lemlist
Visibility score10.1%12.9%
Change vs last weekup+0.1%down−1%
Rank in Sales Engagement#9#7
Share of voice3%3.8%
Mentions this run1925
Positive in AI answers28%34%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Nov 3Instantly 10%

Instantly +0.09999999999999964pp · lemlist −1pp over 1 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

lemlist leads on 2 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
10.2%
16.7%
AI Mode
9.4%
5.7%
Perplexity
10.7%
16.3%
Instantlylemlist

Head to head in AI answers

12 engine answers name both brands

3Instantly ranked higher
9lemlist ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionInstantlylemlist
Pricing modelFlat tiersPer seat
Entry price$47 / mo$69 per seat / mo
Free planNoNo · 14-day trial
DeploymentWeb-based—
Integrations50+58+
Compliance—SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, CCPA
SupportChat support, Premium live support, Dedicated account manager and shared Slack channel on Enterprise plansIn-app live support, 1:1 onboarding sessions, Dedicated account manager (Enterprise), Priority support (Enterprise)
Founded20212018
HeadquartersSheridan, Wyoming, United StatesParis, France
Employees51–200—
FundingBootstrappedSecondary growth equity (Expedition Growth Capital, shares bought from existing shareholders)
Best forSmall teams, agencies and freelancers running cold email outbound at scale.Sales and growth teams running outbound, from solo founders and agencies to scaling sales teams

Plans side by side

Instantly

Outreach Growth$47month
Outreach Hypergrowth$107month
Outreach Light Speed$358month
Outreach EnterpriseCustomcustom
Credits Growth$47month
Credits Supersonic$97month
Hyper Credits$197month (from)
Credits EnterpriseCustomcustom
Starter Bundle$94month
Scale Bundle$194month
Agency Bundle$555month
VIPCustomcustom
Instantly pricing

lemlist

Email$69month (unlimited users, 50,000 emails/mo); $55/month billed yearly
Multichannel$109user / month; $87/user/month billed yearly
EnterpriseCustomcustom
lemlist pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Instantly

  • Cost-effective platform for cold email outreach
  • Strong for high-volume cold email outbound and lead generation
  • Deliverability, warm-up and sending infrastructure
  • Good for agencies managing many sending accounts
  • Highest G2 rating among sales engagement platforms
  • Narrow focus on cold email rather than an all-in-one platform
  • Not a complete CRM or full sales engagement suite

lemlist

  • Strong cold email deliverability
  • Personalized outbound and multichannel campaigns
  • Free trial available
  • Good value for multichannel outbound
  • Intuitive interface with high user ratings
  • More focused on outbound email than complete sales-process management

Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run

Cite as: SlateIndex, “Instantly vs lemlist”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/instantly-vs-lemlist, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.