Skip to content
SlateIndex
JazzHREasy-to-use recruiting software for small business
vs
LeverModern recruiting software that combines ATS and CRM capabilities
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3

JazzHR vs Lever

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Lever is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 22.2 versus 14.4 for JazzHR, and ranks ahead in 73% of the answers that name both.

Choose JazzHR if…

  • Approachable, collaborative ATS for small growing teams
  • Budget-friendly option for small teams
  • Unlimited users and flat entry pricing
  • Low administrative drag for early-stage teams

Choose Lever if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (22.2 vs 14.4)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (44% vs 36% positive)
  • Combines applicant tracking with candidate relationship management (CRM)
  • Strong talent relationship management (TRM) for nurturing passive candidates

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric JazzHR Lever
Visibility score14.4%22.2%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Recruiting#9#3
Share of voice4.3%6.3%
Mentions this run2234
Positive in AI answers36%44%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3JazzHR 14%

JazzHR 0pp · Lever 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Lever leads on 2 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
11.1%
25%
AI Mode
18%
17.4%
Perplexity
14.1%
24.3%
JazzHRLever

Head to head in AI answers

11 engine answers name both brands

3JazzHR ranked higher
8Lever ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionJazzHRLever
Pricing modelFlat tiers—
Entry price$1,000 / mo—
Free planNo—
ComplianceSOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 27001SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 27001
SupportContact the support team through the website, All-Access Support on the Pro planCustomer Support, Phone (888) 885-5299
Founded—2012
HeadquartersDenver, Colorado, USSan Francisco, CA
Employees51–200—
FundingRound led by Volition CapitalSeries D
Best forSmall and mid-sized businesses and lean teams that need an easy-to-use applicant tracking systemSmall, mid-sized and enterprise talent acquisition teams that need to scale hiring efficiently across departments or locations.

Plans side by side

JazzHR

Hero$1,000per year, billed annually
Plus$3,480per year, billed annually
Pro$5,508per year, billed annually
JazzHR pricing

Lever

Pricing not available.

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

JazzHR

  • Approachable, collaborative ATS for small growing teams
  • Budget-friendly option for small teams
  • Unlimited users and flat entry pricing
  • Low administrative drag for early-stage teams
  • Annual plans save up to 24%

    Lever

    • Combines applicant tracking with candidate relationship management (CRM)
    • Strong talent relationship management (TRM) for nurturing passive candidates
    • Recommended for startups and scaling tech companies

      Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

      Cite as: SlateIndex, “JazzHR vs Lever”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/jazzhr-vs-lever, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.