Skip to content
SlateIndex
GreenhouseThe Orchestrated Hiring Ecosystem for the AI era
vs
JazzHREasy-to-use recruiting software for small business
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3

Greenhouse vs JazzHR

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Greenhouse is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 38.5 versus 14.4 for JazzHR, and ranks ahead in 75% of the answers that name both.

Choose Greenhouse if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (38.5 vs 14.4)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (56% vs 36% positive)
  • You need ISO 27001:2022 or ISO 27701:2019 or ISO 42001:2023 or GDPR or CCPA/CPRA or PCI DSS coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)

Choose JazzHR if…

  • You need ISO/IEC 27001 coverage
  • Approachable, collaborative ATS for small growing teams
  • Budget-friendly option for small teams
  • Unlimited users and flat entry pricing

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Greenhouse JazzHR
Visibility score38.5%14.4%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Recruiting#1#9
Share of voice8.1%4.3%
Mentions this run4322
Positive in AI answers56%36%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3Greenhouse 39%

Greenhouse 0pp · JazzHR 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Greenhouse leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
43.5%
11.1%
AI Mode
33.5%
18%
Perplexity
38.3%
14.1%
GreenhouseJazzHR

Head to head in AI answers

12 engine answers name both brands

9Greenhouse ranked higher
3JazzHR ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionGreenhouseJazzHR
Pricing modelFlat tiersFlat tiers
Entry priceContact sales$1,000 / mo
Free planNoNo
ComplianceSOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001:2022, ISO 27701:2019, ISO 42001:2023, GDPR, CCPA/CPRA, PCI DSSSOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 27001
Support—Contact the support team through the website, All-Access Support on the Pro plan
Founded2012—
HeadquartersNew York City, NY, United StatesDenver, Colorado, US
Employees501–1,00051–200
FundingSeries D · $110M raisedRound led by Volition Capital
Best forEmployers that want structured, automated hiring across sourcing, interviews and the ATS, from early-stage companies to global enterprisesSmall and mid-sized businesses and lean teams that need an easy-to-use applicant tracking system

Plans side by side

Greenhouse

CoreCustom
PlusCustom
ProCustom
Greenhouse pricing

JazzHR

Hero$1,000per year, billed annually
Plus$3,480per year, billed annually
Pro$5,508per year, billed annually
JazzHR pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Greenhouse

  • Strong structured hiring and interview scorecards
  • Strong reporting and data visibility
  • Top ratings and popularity for enterprise and mid-market recruiting
  • Integration ecosystem and unified data
  • Reduces hiring bias and supports compliance

    JazzHR

    • Approachable, collaborative ATS for small growing teams
    • Budget-friendly option for small teams
    • Unlimited users and flat entry pricing
    • Low administrative drag for early-stage teams
    • Annual plans save up to 24%

      Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

      Cite as: SlateIndex, “Greenhouse vs JazzHR”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/greenhouse-vs-jazzhr, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.