Keeper Security vs Omada
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Omada is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 0.6 versus 0.5 for Keeper Security, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Keeper Security if…
- You need ISO 27001 or ISO 27017 or ISO 27018 or FedRAMP High or GovRAMP High or FIPS 140-3 or PCI DSS Level 1 or HIPAA or GDPR or FDA 21 CFR Part 11 or TRUSTe coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
Choose Omada if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (0.6 vs 0.5)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need ISO/IEC 27001:2022 coverage
- Recommended as a dedicated IGA product for heavy audit, complex role, ERP, or on-premises needs
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Keeper Security | Omada |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.5% | 0.6% |
| Change vs last week | down−0.1% | up+0.6% |
| Rank in Identity & Access Management | #36 | #34 |
| Share of voice | 0.3% | 0.3% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 1 |
| Positive in AI answers | 0% | 0% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Keeper Security −0.19999999999999996pp · Omada 0pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Omada leads on 2 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Keeper Security | Omada |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which Identity & Access Management vendors do analysts recommend? | ChatGPT | #13 | #9 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Keeper Security | Omada |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | Contact sales | — |
| Free plan | No | — |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS) | SaaS on Microsoft Azure (EU or US region), private tenant, or on-premises |
| Integrations | 100+ | — |
| Compliance | ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, SOC 2 Type 2, SOC 3, FedRAMP High, GovRAMP High, FIPS 140-3, PCI DSS Level 1, HIPAA, GDPR, FDA 21 CFR Part 11, TRUSTe | ISO/IEC 27001:2022, SOC 2 Type 2, SOC 3 |
| Support | Phone support, Live chat, Documentation, Keeper University | Customer Success Team, Service Desk, ITSM system access, Professional services |
| Founded | 2011 | 2000 |
| Headquarters | Chicago, Illinois, United States | Copenhagen, Denmark |
| Employees | 501–1,000 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Minority growth equity (Summit Partners) · $60M raised | Majority investment (GRO and Kirk Kapital) |
| Best for | Organizations wanting password, secrets and privileged access management in one zero-knowledge cloud platform | Regulated enterprises and government organizations that need identity governance and administration |
Plans side by side
Keeper Security
Omada
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Keeper Security
Profile in progress.
Omada
- Recommended as a dedicated IGA product for heavy audit, complex role, ERP, or on-premises needs
- Named among IGA leaders in KuppingerCole 2024 Leadership Compass
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Keeper Security vs Omada”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/keeper-security-vs-omada, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.