Keycloak vs SailPoint
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
SailPoint is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 14.3 versus 5.6 for Keycloak, and ranks ahead in 50% of the answers that name both.
Choose Keycloak if…
- Free and open-source software
- Strong flexibility and customization for technical teams
- Top pick as a self-hosted option
- Backed by Red Hat and community; popular open-source IAM tool
Choose SailPoint if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (14.3 vs 5.6)
- AI answers describe it more positively (50% vs 33% positive)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need CSA STAR Level 2 or C5 or EU-US DPF or FedRAMP Moderate or GovRAMP or IRAP or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 27017 or ISO/IEC 27018 or ISO/IEC 27701 or SOC 1 Type 2 or SOC 2 Type 2 or SOC 3 or Common Criteria coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Keycloak | SailPoint |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 5.6% | 14.3% |
| Change vs last week | down−0.3% | up+0.4% |
| Rank in Identity & Access Management | #15 | #8 |
| Share of voice | 2.1% | 5.3% |
| Mentions this run | 7 | 17 |
| Positive in AI answers | 33% | 50% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Keycloak −0.7000000000000002pp · SailPoint −1.1999999999999993pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
SailPoint leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
2 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Keycloak | SailPoint |
|---|---|---|---|
| What are the best Identity & Access Management tools in 2026? | Perplexity | #8 | #4 |
| Alternatives to the most popular identity and access management platform | Perplexity | #8 | #11 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Keycloak | SailPoint |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment | Self-hosted; ships as a single lightweight container image, with clustering for scalability and availability | Cloud (multi-tenant SaaS) and on-premises (IdentityIQ) |
| Integrations | — | 200+ |
| Compliance | — | CSA STAR Level 2, C5, EU-US DPF, FedRAMP Moderate, GovRAMP, IRAP, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018, ISO/IEC 27701, SOC 1 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 2, SOC 3, Common Criteria |
| Support | Community support via GitHub Discussions, Commercial support via Red Hat build of Keycloak | Customer support requests |
| Founded | 2014 | 2005 |
| Headquarters | — | Austin, Texas, United States |
| Employees | — | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | — | IPO |
| Best for | Teams that want to self-host standards-based single sign-on and identity brokering for their applications | Large enterprises with complex, hybrid or heavily regulated environments needing identity governance for human, machine and AI identities |
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Keycloak
- Free and open-source software
- Strong flexibility and customization for technical teams
- Top pick as a self-hosted option
- Backed by Red Hat and community; popular open-source IAM tool
- Supports SAML, OAuth 2.0, and OpenID Connect
- Team must handle hosting, upgrades, backups, and security
- Less operational simplicity than managed alternatives
SailPoint
- Specialist in identity governance and administration
- Strong compliance, access reviews, and segregation of duties
- Recognized by analysts and peer reviews for IGA
- Suited to large, complex enterprise governance needs
- High cost profile for enterprise deployments
- Pricing requires custom quotes and multi-year contracts
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Keycloak vs SailPoint”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/keycloak-vs-sailpoint, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.