LeverModern recruiting software that combines ATS and CRM capabilities
vs
TestGorillaFind great talent. Prove they can do the job.
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3
Lever vs TestGorilla
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Lever is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 22.2 versus 0.6 for TestGorilla, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.
Choose Lever if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (22.2 vs 0.6)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO/IEC 27001 coverage
- Combines applicant tracking with candidate relationship management (CRM)
- Strong talent relationship management (TRM) for nurturing passive candidates
Choose TestGorilla if…
- You need GDPR compliant or SOC 2 Type II compliant coverage
- automated sending of tests and automatic score return
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Lever | TestGorilla |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 22.2% | 0.6% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #3 | #59 |
| Share of voice | 6.3% | 0.4% |
| Mentions this run | 34 | 2 |
| Positive in AI answers | 44% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Lever 0pp · TestGorilla 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Lever leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
LeverTestGorilla
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
0Lever ranked higher
1TestGorilla ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Lever | TestGorilla |
|---|---|---|---|
| What should a recruiting platform integrate with? | ChatGPT | #15 | #12 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Lever | TestGorilla |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Per seat |
| Entry price | — | Free; paid from $74 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 27001 | GDPR compliant, SOC 2 Type II compliant |
| Support | Customer Support, Phone (888) 885-5299 | Help center, 24/7 live chat, Email support, Digital onboarding guides |
| Founded | 2012 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, CA | Amsterdam, Netherlands |
| Employees | — | 201–500 |
| Funding | Series D | Series A · $80M raised |
| Best for | Small, mid-sized and enterprise talent acquisition teams that need to scale hiring efficiently across departments or locations. | Small companies with limited hiring needs (Core plan) and larger teams screening candidates at scale (Plus plan). |
Plans side by side
Lever
Pricing not available.
TestGorilla
Gorilla Sourcing Free$0month
Gorilla Sourcing Core$74per Sourcing seat per month, billed annually
Gorilla Sourcing Plus$134per Sourcing seat per month, billed annually
Gorilla Assessments Free$0month
Gorilla Assessments Core$215per account per month, billed annually (from)
Gorilla Assessments Plus$520per account per month, billed annually (from)
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Lever
- Combines applicant tracking with candidate relationship management (CRM)
- Strong talent relationship management (TRM) for nurturing passive candidates
- Recommended for startups and scaling tech companies
TestGorilla
- automated sending of tests and automatic score return
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Lever vs TestGorilla”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/lever-vs-testgorilla, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.