Skip to content
SlateIndex
LinkSquaresThe agentic CLM software trusted by contract teams to draft, review, and manage contracts faster with AI.
vs
ResponsiveResponsive AI powers bids, questionnaires, and trust centers with insight, accuracy, and speed.
Comparison · Proposals & Contracts · weekly run Nov 2

LinkSquares vs Responsive

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Responsive is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 10.7 versus 1.4 for LinkSquares, and ranks ahead in 50% of the answers that name both.

Choose LinkSquares if…

  • You need SOC 2 Type II coverage
  • Powerful AI-driven contract analytics
  • Useful post-signature insights
  • Suited to fast-growing companies and in-house counsel

Choose Responsive if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (10.7 vs 1.4)
  • You need AICPA SOC 2 or STAR Level 1 coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
  • Strong enterprise choice for high-volume RFPs

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 2

Metric LinkSquares Responsive
Visibility score1.4%10.7%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Proposals & Contracts#31#10
Share of voice0.6%4%
Mentions this run320
Positive in AI answers33%33%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2LinkSquares 1%

LinkSquares 0pp · Responsive 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Responsive leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
2.2%
3%
AI Mode
2%
15.7%
Perplexity
0%
13.3%
LinkSquaresResponsive

Head to head in AI answers

2 engine answers name both brands

1LinkSquares ranked higher
1Responsive ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionLinkSquaresResponsive
Pricing model—Flat tiers
Entry price—$10,000 / mo
Free plan—No
DeploymentMulti-tenant or single-tenant cloud SaaS hosted on U.S.-based AWS infrastructureFlexible hosting options
Integrations—32+
ComplianceSOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, ISO 42001, GDPR, CCPAGDPR, AICPA SOC 2, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, ISO 42001, CCPA, STAR Level 1
Support—Professional Services with APMP-certified experts for onboarding and training, Premium deployment and support on Growth and Enterprise editions
Founded20152015
HeadquartersBoston, MA, United StatesFrisco, Texas, United States
Employees201–500501–1,000
FundingAnnounced funding round (undated) · $160M raisedRound led by Elevate Capital
Best forLegal, procurement, finance and sales teams that need every agreement in one governed systemDedicated proposal or operations teams with legal, InfoSec and compliance involvement, and global or multi-region operations.

Plans side by side

LinkSquares

Pricing not available.

Responsive

Emerging Edition$10,000year (starting from, platform fee)
Growth EditionCustomyear
Enterprise EditionCustomyear
Responsive pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

LinkSquares

  • Powerful AI-driven contract analytics
  • Useful post-signature insights
  • Suited to fast-growing companies and in-house counsel

    Responsive

    • Strong enterprise choice for high-volume RFPs
    • Designed for complex enterprise responses
    • Top pick for RFP response management
    • Good for security questionnaires and large-scale content reuse
    • Recommended in G2's 2026 RFP software list

      Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

      Cite as: SlateIndex, “LinkSquares vs Responsive”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/linksquares-vs-responsive, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.