LogicMonitor vs New Relic
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
New Relic is the stronger AI pick in Observability: it has a visibility score of 47.1 versus 2.5 for LogicMonitor, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose LogicMonitor if…
- You need more native integrations (3000+ vs 800+)
- You need FedRAMP authorized coverage
- Automated infrastructure monitoring and enterprise observability
- Relevant for hybrid infrastructure monitoring
Choose New Relic if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (47.1 vs 2.5)
- You want a lower entry price ($10 vs $16)
- AI answers describe it more positively (42% vs 20% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or FedRAMP Moderate (eligible accounts) or HIPAA eligibility or ISO 27001 or ISO 42001 AI certification coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | LogicMonitor | New Relic |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 2.5% | 47.1% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Observability | #22 | #3 |
| Share of voice | 0.9% | 10.7% |
| Mentions this run | 5 | 63 |
| Positive in AI answers | 20% | 42% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
LogicMonitor 0pp · New Relic 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
New Relic leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
4 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | LogicMonitor | New Relic |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which observability vendors do analysts recommend? | Perplexity | #13 | #5 |
| Official website of the top observability platform vendors | ChatGPT | #10 | #3 |
| Official website of the top observability platform vendors | AI Mode | #14 | #3 |
| Official website of the top observability platform vendors | Perplexity | #10 | #3 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | LogicMonitor | New Relic |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Usage-based |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $16 / mo | Free; paid from $10 / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | — | Cloud-based SaaS |
| Integrations | 3000+ | 800+ |
| Compliance | FedRAMP authorized | SOC 2 Type II, FedRAMP Moderate (eligible accounts), HIPAA eligibility, ISO 27001, ISO 42001 AI certification |
| Support | Support Center with basic technical assistance and documentation, Enhanced and Premier support tiers, Professional Services, LM Community peer forum | Ticketed support, 2-hour critical initial response SLA on Pro, 1-hour critical initial response SLA and priority ticket routing on Enterprise |
| Founded | 2007 | 2008 |
| Headquarters | Santa Barbara, CA, United States | San Francisco, CA, United States |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Growth round led by PSG and Golub Capital · $942M raised | Post-IPO raise (not corroborated by other sources) |
| Best for | Enterprises operating complex hybrid IT estates that want to reduce tool sprawl and alert noise. | Engineers responsible for application and system uptime and reliability, and teams that want full-stack observability starting from a free tier. |
Plans side by side
LogicMonitor
New Relic
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
LogicMonitor
- Automated infrastructure monitoring and enterprise observability
- Relevant for hybrid infrastructure monitoring
New Relic
- Generous permanent free tier with 100 GB monthly ingest
- Easy setup and quick APM start with minimal upfront cost
- Unified, consumption-based pricing model
- Strong full-stack observability platform and APM pioneer
- Value and accessibility with AI-assisted querying and diagnostics
- Costs can surprise as log and trace volume scales
- Pricing requires careful cost governance and depends on usage
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “LogicMonitor vs New Relic”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/logicmonitor-vs-new-relic, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.