Skip to content
SlateIndex
LoopioAI RFP Software Built for the People Behind Every RFP
vs
QuoteWerksQuote Faster. Price Accurately. Keep Everything Connected.
Comparison · Proposals & Contracts · weekly run Nov 2

Loopio vs QuoteWerks

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Loopio is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 6 versus 1.9 for QuoteWerks, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.

Choose Loopio if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (6 vs 1.9)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (46% vs 0% positive)
  • You need SOC 2 Type II or GDPR compliant or CCPA compliant coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)

Choose QuoteWerks if…

  • Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 2

Metric Loopio QuoteWerks
Visibility score6%1.9%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Proposals & Contracts#15#25
Share of voice2.2%0.5%
Mentions this run123
Positive in AI answers46%0%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Loopio 6%

Loopio 0pp · QuoteWerks 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Loopio leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
2.6%
0.9%
AI Mode
6.7%
0%
Perplexity
8.9%
4.6%
LoopioQuoteWerks

Head to head in AI answers

1 engine answers name both brands

1Loopio ranked higher
0QuoteWerks ranked higher
PromptEngineLoopioQuoteWerks
Which Proposals & Contracts vendors do analysts recommend? ChatGPT#9#17

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionLoopioQuoteWerks
Pricing modelFlat tiersPer seat
Entry priceContact sales$50 per seat / mo
Free planNoNo
DeploymentCloud-delivered, hosted on Amazon Web ServicesCloud, desktop, or hybrid of both
Integrations—115+
ComplianceSOC 2 Type II, GDPR compliant, CCPA compliant—
SupportOnboarding Manager training and setup, Ongoing Customer Success guidance, On-demand learning hub, Phone, email and in-app supportEmail support, Phone support for all editions, In-house support team in Orlando, FL
Founded20141993
HeadquartersToronto, CanadaOrlando, FL, USA
Employees201–50011–50
FundingStrategic investment from Sumeru Equity PartnersBootstrapped
Best forProposal and bid managers, sales teams, pre-sales, IT and InfoSec, investor relations and marketing teams that answer RFPs, DDQs and security questionnaires.Sales teams that sell configurable products or services, such as IT solution providers, MSPs and systems integrators, and want pricing control and a connected quote-to-order process.

Plans side by side

Loopio

FoundationsCustom
EnhancedCustom
EnterpriseCustom
Loopio pricing

QuoteWerks

Essential$50month per concurrent user
Balanced$78month per concurrent user
Pinnacle$102month per concurrent user
QuoteWerks pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Loopio

  • Centralized reusable content management for RFPs
  • Strong for high-volume RFP and security questionnaire responses
  • Recognized as a leading enterprise RFP response tool

    QuoteWerks

    Profile in progress.

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “Loopio vs QuoteWerks”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/loopio-vs-quotewerks, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.