MakeAI automation you can visually build and orchestrate in real time.
vs
QuickbaseThe AI-powered operations platform for your unique processes.
Comparison · Low-Code & No-Code · weekly run Nov 3
Make vs Quickbase
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Make is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 6.3 versus 4 for Quickbase.
Choose Make if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (6.3 vs 4)
- You need more native integrations (3500+ vs 40+)
- AI answers describe it more positively (41% vs 13% positive)
- You need GDPR or ISO 27001 coverage
Choose Quickbase if…
- You need SOC 1 Type II or HIPAA Security Rule or DFARS CSA CCM STAR Level 2 or TX-RAMP Level 2 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
- Recognised among established low-code platforms
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Make | Quickbase |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 6.3% | 4% |
| Change vs last week | down−7.8% | down−0.4% |
| Rank in Low-Code & No-Code | #16 | #25 |
| Share of voice | 2.3% | 1.3% |
| Mentions this run | 13 | 8 |
| Positive in AI answers | 41% | 13% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Make −7.8pp · Quickbase −0.40000000000000036pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Make leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
MakeQuickbase
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Make ranked higher
0Quickbase ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Make | Quickbase |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment | Cloud, hosted on Amazon AWS | — |
| Integrations | 3500+ | 40+ |
| Compliance | GDPR, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3, ISO 27001 | SOC 1 Type II, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3, HIPAA Security Rule, DFARS CSA CCM STAR Level 2, TX-RAMP Level 2 |
| Support | Help center, Community forum, 24/7 support on Enterprise plans, Dedicated support team on Enterprise plans | Expert support, Partners and services, Active community champions, Training and best practices for a Center of Excellence |
| Founded | 2012 | 1999 |
| Headquarters | Prague, Czech Republic | Boston, Massachusetts |
| Employees | 201–500 | 501–1,000 |
| Funding | — | Funding round |
| Best for | Teams and organizations deploying AI and automation across the business, from a single department to company-wide. | Business teams that need custom apps for complex projects, processes and field operations without writing code. |
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Make
- Free tier with 1,000 credits per month
- Transparent pricing with paid plans from $12/month
- Visual, no-code automation between existing apps
- Integrations with more than 3,000 apps
- Built-in AI agents for business workflows
Quickbase
- Recognised among established low-code platforms
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Make vs Quickbase”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/make-vs-quickbase, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.