MakeAI automation you can visually build and orchestrate in real time.
vs
TanaYour meetings. Minus the homework.
Comparison · Knowledge Management · weekly run Nov 3
Make vs Tana
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Make is the stronger AI pick in Knowledge Management: it has a visibility score of 14.4 versus 1.3 for Tana.
Choose Make if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (14.4 vs 1.3)
- You need GDPR or SOC 2 Type II or SOC 3 or ISO 27001 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
- Free tier with 1,000 credits per month
Choose Tana if…
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or GDPR compliant coverage
- powerful node-based outliner
- turns messy notes into structured networked hubs
- advanced AI-powered knowledge management
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Make | Tana |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 14.4% | 1.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Knowledge Management | #7 | #42 |
| Share of voice | 3.1% | 0.6% |
| Mentions this run | 17 | 3 |
| Positive in AI answers | 41% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Make 0pp · Tana 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Make leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
MakeTana
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Make ranked higher
0Tana ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Make | Tana |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Per seat |
| Entry price | — | Free; paid from $19 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud, hosted on Amazon AWS | Desktop app for Mac, Windows and Linux, plus web |
| Integrations | 3500+ | — |
| Compliance | GDPR, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3, ISO 27001 | SOC 2 Type 2, GDPR compliant |
| Support | Help center, Community forum, 24/7 support on Enterprise plans, Dedicated support team on Enterprise plans | FAQ on tana.inc, Designated customer success manager on the Business plan |
| Founded | 2012 | — |
| Headquarters | Prague, Czech Republic | Palo Alto, CA, United States |
| Employees | 201–500 | 11–50 |
| Funding | — | Series A · $25M raised |
| Best for | Teams and organizations deploying AI and automation across the business, from a single department to company-wide. | AI-native teams whose agents need meeting context |
Plans side by side
Make
Pricing not available.
Tana
Free$0free forever
Pro$19per member per month, billed monthly
Business$35per member per month, billed yearly (from price)
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Make
- Free tier with 1,000 credits per month
- Transparent pricing with paid plans from $12/month
- Visual, no-code automation between existing apps
- Integrations with more than 3,000 apps
- Built-in AI agents for business workflows
Tana
- powerful node-based outliner
- turns messy notes into structured networked hubs
- advanced AI-powered knowledge management
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Make vs Tana”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/make-vs-tana, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.