MastraTypeScript AI Framework for Agents and Apps
vs
Tray.aiOrchestrate integration, automation, and agents
Comparison · AI Agents · weekly run Nov 3
Mastra vs Tray.ai
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Tray.ai is the stronger AI pick in AI Agents: it has a visibility score of 1.5 versus 1.2 for Mastra.
Choose Mastra if…
- You want a free plan to start
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than usage-based
- Type-safe, production-grade application code
- Suited to serious production systems
Choose Tray.ai if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (1.5 vs 1.2)
- You need SOC 1 or SOC 2 or HIPAA or GDPR coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
- Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Mastra | Tray.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.2% | 1.5% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Agents | #56 | #50 |
| Share of voice | 0.5% | 0.4% |
| Mentions this run | 3 | 3 |
| Positive in AI answers | 100% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Mastra 0pp · Tray.ai 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Tray.ai leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
MastraTray.ai
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Mastra ranked higher
0Tray.ai ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Mastra | Tray.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Usage-based |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $250 / mo | Contact sales |
| Free plan | Yes | No · 30-day trial |
| Deployment | Self-hosted on any Node.js-compatible environment, or hosted on Mastra Cloud and Mastra Platform. | Tray-managed cloud runtime, with on-premise connectivity and regional hosting on Enterprise plans |
| Integrations | — | 700+ |
| Compliance | — | SOC 1, SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR |
| Support | Shared Slack support channel (Enterprise), Dedicated support engineer (Enterprise), SLA support 8-5 Monday-Friday, 8am-6pm PST | Business hours support on all plans, Knowledge base, Community forums, Tray Academy |
| Founded | 2024 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco | San Francisco, CA |
| Employees | 11–50 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Series A · $35M raised | Series C-2 · $164M raised |
| Best for | Developers and teams building AI agents in TypeScript and JavaScript | Enterprise IT and business teams that need to build integrations, AI agents and governed MCP tools on one platform |
Plans side by side
Tray.ai
ProCustomSized to your needs
TeamCustomSized to your needs
EnterpriseCustomSized to your needs
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Mastra
- Type-safe, production-grade application code
- Suited to serious production systems
Tray.ai
- Recommended as a cloud-neutral orchestration platform option
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Mastra vs Tray.ai”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/mastra-vs-tray-ai, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.