MembrainMembrain is the brain of your sales organization.
vs
QwilrHelp your worst rep send your best proposals.
Comparison · Sales Enablement · weekly run Nov 2
Membrain vs Qwilr
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Qwilr is the stronger AI pick in Sales Enablement: it has a visibility score of 1.5 versus 1.4 for Membrain.
Choose Membrain if…
- You need SOC 2 Type 1 coverage
Choose Qwilr if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (1.5 vs 1.4)
- You want a lower entry price ($35 vs $49)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or PCI-DSS coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (51–200 employees)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Membrain | Qwilr |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.4% | 1.5% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Sales Enablement | #29 | #28 |
| Share of voice | 0.3% | 0.3% |
| Mentions this run | 2 | 2 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 51% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Membrain 0pp · Qwilr 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Qwilr leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
MembrainQwilr
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Membrain ranked higher
0Qwilr ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Membrain | Qwilr |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | $49 per seat / mo | $35 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No | No · 14-day trial |
| Deployment | Cloud-based | Web-based, web-native software |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 1 | SOC 2 Type II, PCI-DSS |
| Support | Help Center, Services & Training, Ongoing support | Email support, Help center, Chat support, Training sessions |
| Founded | 2012 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Stockholm, Sweden | Redfern, New South Wales, Australia |
| Employees | 11–50 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Additional business angels (Bengt Nilsson and Thomas Rogalin) | Series A (AirTree Ventures) · $9M raised |
| Best for | Complex B2B sales organizations that want their sales process, playbooks and coaching built into the CRM. | Sales teams that send proposals, quotes and contracts and want to track buyer engagement. |
Plans side by side
Membrain
Prospecting$49user / month
Active Pipeline$69user / month
Account Growth$89user / month
Elevate$89coach / month
Qwilr
Starter$35user/month, billed annually ($49 monthly)
Growth$55user/month, annual only, min 5 users
Scale$75user/month, annual only, min 10 users
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Membrain
Profile in progress.
Qwilr
- Interactive, web-based proposals
- Polished, visually striking proposal presentation
- Frequently shortlisted and highly rated among proposal tools
- Lower cost with annual billing
- 14-day free trial available
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Membrain vs Qwilr”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/membrain-vs-qwilr, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.