New RelicIntelligent Observability resolves issues at scale before they impact your bottom line.
vs
VictoriaMetricsSimple, Reliable, Efficient Observability
Comparison · Observability · weekly run Nov 3
New Relic vs VictoriaMetrics
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
New Relic is the stronger AI pick in Observability: it has a visibility score of 47.1 versus 0 for VictoriaMetrics.
Choose New Relic if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (47.1 vs 0)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or FedRAMP Moderate (eligible accounts) or HIPAA eligibility or ISO 27001 or ISO 42001 AI certification coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
- Generous permanent free tier with 100 GB monthly ingest
Choose VictoriaMetrics if…
- You need ISO/IEC 27001:2013 coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | New Relic | VictoriaMetrics |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 47.1% | 0% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Observability | #3 | #44 |
| Share of voice | 10.7% | 0% |
| Mentions this run | 63 | 0 |
| Positive in AI answers | 42% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
New Relic 0pp · VictoriaMetrics 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
New Relic leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
New RelicVictoriaMetrics
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0New Relic ranked higher
0VictoriaMetrics ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | New Relic | VictoriaMetrics |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $10 / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | Cloud-based SaaS | Self-hosted on-premise, hybrid or cloud, or fully managed through VictoriaMetrics Cloud |
| Integrations | 800+ | — |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, FedRAMP Moderate (eligible accounts), HIPAA eligibility, ISO 27001, ISO 42001 AI certification | ISO/IEC 27001:2013 |
| Support | Ticketed support, 2-hour critical initial response SLA on Pro, 1-hour critical initial response SLA and priority ticket routing on Enterprise | Community support through chats, GitHub issues and events, Enterprise support from the VictoriaMetrics engineering team |
| Founded | 2008 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, CA, United States | San Francisco, California, United States |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Post-IPO raise (not corroborated by other sources) | Bootstrapped |
| Best for | Engineers responsible for application and system uptime and reliability, and teams that want full-stack observability starting from a free tier. | Teams with large volumes of metrics, strict query latency requirements, or a need for cost-effective long-term storage for Prometheus data |
Plans side by side
New Relic
Free$0per month, one full platform user and 100 GB ingest
Standard$10per first full platform user/month; $99 per additional user (max 5)
Pro$349per full platform user/month (annual commitment); $418.80 monthly pay as you go
EnterpriseCustomcontact sales
VictoriaMetrics
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
New Relic
- Generous permanent free tier with 100 GB monthly ingest
- Easy setup and quick APM start with minimal upfront cost
- Unified, consumption-based pricing model
- Strong full-stack observability platform and APM pioneer
- Value and accessibility with AI-assisted querying and diagnostics
- Costs can surprise as log and trace volume scales
- Pricing requires careful cost governance and depends on usage
VictoriaMetrics
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “New Relic vs VictoriaMetrics”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/new-relic-vs-victoriametrics, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.