Skip to content
SlateIndex
OneflowSmart contracts that feel like magic.
vs
QwilrHelp your worst rep send your best proposals.
Comparison · Proposals & Contracts · weekly run Nov 2

Oneflow vs Qwilr

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Qwilr is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 28.3 versus 16.1 for Oneflow, and ranks ahead in 92% of the answers that name both.

Choose Oneflow if…

  • You need ISO 27001 or ISO 9001 or ISO 14001 or SOC 1 Type 1 or SOC 2 Type 1 coverage
  • Dynamic, collaborative digital contracts that stay editable after sending
  • Live contract editing and negotiation, reducing email back-and-forth
  • Free tier with basic contract management, comments, audit trails and dashboards

Choose Qwilr if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (28.3 vs 16.1)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (51% vs 32% positive)
  • You need SOC 2 Type II or PCI-DSS coverage
  • Interactive, web-based proposals

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 2

Metric Oneflow Qwilr
Visibility score16.1%28.3%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Proposals & Contracts#7#4
Share of voice4.9%7.2%
Mentions this run2737
Positive in AI answers32%51%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Oneflow 16%

Oneflow 0pp · Qwilr 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Qwilr leads on 2 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
1.9%
30.2%
AI Mode
10.2%
26.9%
Perplexity
36.3%
27.8%
OneflowQwilr

Head to head in AI answers

13 engine answers name both brands

1Oneflow ranked higher
12Qwilr ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionOneflowQwilr
Pricing model—Per seat
Entry price—$35 per seat / mo
Free plan—No · 14-day trial
DeploymentSaaSWeb-based, web-native software
ComplianceISO 27001, ISO 9001, ISO 14001, SOC 1 Type 1, SOC 2 Type 1SOC 2 Type II, PCI-DSS
SupportDedicated onboarding in the Enterprise tierEmail support, Help center, Chat support, Training sessions
Founded20122014
HeadquartersStockholm, SwedenRedfern, New South Wales, Australia
Employees51–20051–200
FundingPrivate investment of SEK 20 million from Mattias StåhlgrenSeries A (AirTree Ventures) · $9M raised
Best forTeams of all shapes and sizes that need to handle their contractsSales teams that send proposals, quotes and contracts and want to track buyer engagement.

Plans side by side

Oneflow

Pricing not available.

Qwilr

Starter$35user/month, billed annually ($49 monthly)
Growth$55user/month, annual only, min 5 users
Scale$75user/month, annual only, min 10 users
Qwilr pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Oneflow

  • Dynamic, collaborative digital contracts that stay editable after sending
  • Live contract editing and negotiation, reducing email back-and-forth
  • Free tier with basic contract management, comments, audit trails and dashboards
  • Proposal-to-contract workflow turning interactive proposals into live contracts
  • Strong for contract management, with online signing and post-signature tracking
  • Interactive proposals and editable contracts require a paid plan
  • Smaller review coverage and pricing generally targets larger teams

Qwilr

  • Interactive, web-based proposals
  • Polished, visually striking proposal presentation
  • Frequently shortlisted and highly rated among proposal tools
  • Lower cost with annual billing
  • 14-day free trial available

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “Oneflow vs Qwilr”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/oneflow-vs-qwilr, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.