OutreachAgentic AI Platform for Revenue Teams
vs
QuickMailGet hot leads on LinkedIn & cold email like a pro
Comparison · Sales Engagement · weekly run Nov 3
Outreach vs QuickMail
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Outreach is the stronger AI pick in Sales Engagement: it has a visibility score of 55.1 versus 0 for QuickMail.
Choose Outreach if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (55.1 vs 0)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 or ISO 27701 or ISO 42001 or HIPAA or CSA STAR coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
Choose QuickMail if…
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Outreach | QuickMail |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 55.1% | 0% |
| Change vs last week | down−20.3% | no change0% |
| Rank in Sales Engagement | #2 | #54 |
| Share of voice | 10.1% | 0% |
| Mentions this run | 61 | 0 |
| Positive in AI answers | 28% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Outreach −20.300000000000004pp · QuickMail 0pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Outreach leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
OutreachQuickMail
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Outreach ranked higher
0QuickMail ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Outreach | QuickMail |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | Contact sales | $49 / mo |
| Free plan | No | No · 14-day trial |
| Deployment | — | Cloud-based |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, ISO 42001, HIPAA, CSA STAR | — |
| Support | Plus support included with Amplify Core, Managed services included with Amplify Pro, Technical account management and enterprise support, Professional services packages for onboarding | Expert support on all plans, Priority expert support on Growth and Agency plans |
| Founded | 2014 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Seattle, Washington | Zug, Switzerland |
| Employees | 501–1,000 | 11–50 |
| Funding | Series G · $489M raised | Undisclosed round |
| Best for | Revenue teams, from SDRs and account executives to sales managers, RevOps and customer success, that want prospecting, deal management, coaching and forecasting in one platform. | Growth teams and lead generation agencies that run cold email and LinkedIn outreach |
Plans side by side
Outreach
Amplify EssentialsCustomcustom pricing (seat-based + AI credits)
Amplify CoreCustomcustom pricing (seat-based + AI credits)
Amplify PlusCustomcustom pricing (seat-based + AI credits)
Amplify ProCustomcustom pricing (seat-based + AI credits)
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Outreach
- Enterprise-grade, mature task-driven sequencing platform
- Deep workflow controls and granular sequence analytics
- Recognized as an enterprise leader by analysts
- Strong multi-channel sequencing, AI-guided selling and forecasting
- Quote-based pricing with no public prices
- Heavy and complex, slow to configure
- Annual contracts with minimum seat counts
QuickMail
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Outreach vs QuickMail”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/outreach-vs-quickmail, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.