Planisware vs Wrike
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Wrike is the stronger AI pick in Project Management: it has a visibility score of 13.5 versus 2.8 for Planisware, and ranks ahead in 80% of the answers that name both.
Choose Planisware if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (75% vs 39% positive)
- You need ISO-certified standards coverage
- recommended by analysts for large-enterprise project and portfolio management
- suited to formal portfolio governance and resource optimization
Choose Wrike if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (13.5 vs 2.8)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001:2013 or ISO 27018:2019 or CSA STAR or GDPR-compliant or CCPA-compliant coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
- Multi-department project tracking, time tracking, and customizable workflows
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Planisware | Wrike |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 2.8% | 13.5% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Project Management | #26 | #8 |
| Share of voice | 1% | 4.4% |
| Mentions this run | 6 | 26 |
| Positive in AI answers | 75% | 39% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Planisware 0pp · Wrike 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Wrike leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
5 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Planisware | Wrike |
|---|---|---|---|
| Compare the leading Project Management platforms | Perplexity | #17 | #5 |
| Which Project Management vendors do analysts recommend? | ChatGPT | #7 | #5 |
| Which Project Management vendors do analysts recommend? | Perplexity | #1 | #6 |
| Official website of the top project management tool vendors | AI Mode | #10 | #8 |
| Official website of the top project management tool vendors | Perplexity | #15 | #7 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Planisware | Wrike |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Per seat |
| Entry price | — | Free; paid from $10 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud-based SaaS on a fully owned, single-tenant cloud infrastructure | Cloud-only; data is hosted in Paris, France for European sign-ups and in Santa Clara, California for other accounts |
| Integrations | — | 400+ |
| Compliance | ISO-certified standards | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001:2013, ISO 27018:2019, CSA STAR, GDPR-compliant, CCPA-compliant |
| Support | — | Professional services and deployment consultancy, Premium support |
| Founded | 1996 | 2006 |
| Headquarters | Châtillon, France | San Diego, California, US |
| Employees | 501–1,000 | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | IPO on Euronext Paris (about €278 million including over-allotment) | Series B |
| Best for | PMOs that need a turnkey PPM solution with immediate results and room to grow | Enterprises that want AI agents and work management under governed controls at scale |
Plans side by side
Planisware
Pricing not available.
Wrike
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Planisware
- recommended by analysts for large-enterprise project and portfolio management
- suited to formal portfolio governance and resource optimization
Wrike
- Multi-department project tracking, time tracking, and customizable workflows
- Request forms, proofing, workload planning, and approvals for creative agencies
- Portfolio controls and risk management for large organizations
- Enterprise-scale planning and reporting
- Managing several complex projects with resource allocation and PMO governance
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Planisware vs Wrike”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/planisware-vs-wrike, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.