PylonThe Agentic Support Platform
vs
tawk.toOne free inbox for all your customer channels.
Comparison · Live Chat & AI Support · weekly run Nov 3
Pylon vs tawk.to
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
tawk.to is the stronger AI pick in Live Chat & AI Support: it has a visibility score of 27.6 versus 1.9 for Pylon.
Choose Pylon if…
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or GDPR or HIPAA coverage
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
- Best for B2B SaaS with enterprise Slack/Teams-first support
- Strong for B2B account-centric and high-touch support
Choose tawk.to if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (27.6 vs 1.9)
- You want a free plan to start
- AI answers describe it more positively (70% vs 33% positive)
- You need EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework or UK Extension to the EU-U.S. DPF or Swiss-U.S. Data Privacy Framework or ICO (UK) registration or GDPR compliance coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Pylon | tawk.to |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.9% | 27.6% |
| Change vs last week | up+0.7% | down−4.3% |
| Rank in Live Chat & AI Support | #22 | #6 |
| Share of voice | 0.4% | 7.1% |
| Mentions this run | 2 | 34 |
| Positive in AI answers | 33% | 70% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Pylon +0.7pp · tawk.to −4.299999999999997pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
tawk.to leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
Pylontawk.to
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Pylon ranked higher
0tawk.to ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Pylon | tawk.to |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | $89 per seat / mo | Contact sales |
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud (AWS, US or EU hosting) | — |
| Integrations | — | 50+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, GDPR, HIPAA | EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework, UK Extension to the EU-U.S. DPF, Swiss-U.S. Data Privacy Framework, ICO (UK) registration, GDPR compliance |
| Support | Onboarding, Dedicated CSM, Priority support SLAs, Help Center | 24x7-365 live support, Help Center at help.tawk.to, Email support@tawk.to |
| Founded | 2022 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, CA, United States | Las Vegas, Nevada, US |
| Employees | 51–200 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Series B · $51M raised | Series B |
| Best for | B2B support teams handling customers over Slack Connect, Teams and other shared channels | Businesses of any size that want free live chat with unlimited team members and no per-seat fees. |
Plans side by side
Pylon
Professional$89seat/month, billed annually
Advanced$139seat/month, billed annually
EnterpriseCustomcustom quote
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Pylon
- Best for B2B SaaS with enterprise Slack/Teams-first support
- Strong for B2B account-centric and high-touch support
- Modern, Slack-Connect and developer-centric B2B support
- Frequently included in shortlists of top B2B SaaS support tools
tawk.to
- Completely free core live chat
- Unlimited agents and chats on free tier
- Widely used, high-volume live chat tool
- Good value for budget-conscious small teams
- Highly rated by users on review sites
- Tawk.to branding on widget unless paid
- Limited advanced automation and reporting on free plan
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Pylon vs tawk.to”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/pylon-vs-tawk-to, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.