Crisp vs tawk.to
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
tawk.to is the stronger AI pick in Live Chat & AI Support: it has a visibility score of 27.6 versus 22.9 for Crisp, and ranks ahead in 48% of the answers that name both.
Choose Crisp if…
- You need more native integrations (100+ vs 50+)
- Free plan for two seats
- Shared inbox for small teams
- Flat per-workspace pricing
Choose tawk.to if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (27.6 vs 22.9)
- AI answers describe it more positively (70% vs 57% positive)
- You need EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework or UK Extension to the EU-U.S. DPF or Swiss-U.S. Data Privacy Framework or ICO (UK) registration or GDPR compliance coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Crisp | tawk.to |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 22.9% | 27.6% |
| Change vs last week | down−1.4% | down−4.3% |
| Rank in Live Chat & AI Support | #7 | #6 |
| Share of voice | 6.6% | 7.1% |
| Mentions this run | 32 | 34 |
| Positive in AI answers | 57% | 70% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Crisp −1.4000000000000021pp · tawk.to −4.299999999999997pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
tawk.to leads on 2 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
23 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Crisp | tawk.to |
|---|---|---|---|
| What are the best Live Chat & AI Support tools in 2026? | Perplexity | #5 | #6 |
| Best live chat tool for startups | ChatGPT | #1 | #6 |
| Best live chat tool for startups | AI Mode | #1 | #4 |
| Best live chat tool for startups | Perplexity | #1 | #7 |
| Compare the leading Live Chat & AI Support platforms | Perplexity | #5 | #9 |
| Alternatives to the most popular live chat tool | ChatGPT | #3 | #6 |
| Alternatives to the most popular live chat tool | AI Mode | #4 | #5 |
| Alternatives to the most popular live chat tool | Perplexity | #6 | #4 |
| Best live chat tool with AI features | Perplexity | #1 | #5 |
| Most affordable live chat tool that is still reliable | ChatGPT | #2 | #1 |
| Most affordable live chat tool that is still reliable | AI Mode | #2 | #1 |
| Which Live Chat & AI Support vendors do analysts recommend? | Perplexity | #7 | #9 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Crisp | tawk.to |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $45 / mo | Contact sales |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | Hosted cloud software (SaaS) | — |
| Integrations | 100+ | 50+ |
| Compliance | — | EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework, UK Extension to the EU-U.S. DPF, Swiss-U.S. Data Privacy Framework, ICO (UK) registration, GDPR compliance |
| Support | Help center, Dedicated onboarding and personalized SLA on the Enterprise plan | 24x7-365 live support, Help Center at help.tawk.to, Email support@tawk.to |
| Founded | 2015 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Nantes, France | Las Vegas, Nevada, US |
| Employees | 11–50 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Bootstrapped | Series B |
| Best for | Small and medium-sized businesses looking for AI-powered omnichannel customer support software | Businesses of any size that want free live chat with unlimited team members and no per-seat fees. |
Plans side by side
Crisp
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Crisp
- Free plan for two seats
- Shared inbox for small teams
- Flat per-workspace pricing
- AI-powered support and ease of use
- Modern, clean interface
- Contact and automation limits on free tier
tawk.to
- Completely free core live chat
- Unlimited agents and chats on free tier
- Widely used, high-volume live chat tool
- Good value for budget-conscious small teams
- Highly rated by users on review sites
- Tawk.to branding on widget unless paid
- Limited advanced automation and reporting on free plan
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Crisp vs tawk.to”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/crisp-vs-tawk-to, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.