Qwilr vs Upland Qvidian
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Qwilr is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 28.3 versus 1 for Upland Qvidian, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Qwilr if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (28.3 vs 1)
- AI answers describe it more positively (51% vs 0% positive)
- You need PCI-DSS coverage
- Interactive, web-based proposals
Choose Upland Qvidian if…
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
- Enterprise-oriented for structured proposal and RFP processes
- Recommended for formal RFPs and security questionnaires
- Suited to large-scale content reuse
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Qwilr | Upland Qvidian |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 28.3% | 1% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Proposals & Contracts | #4 | #38 |
| Share of voice | 7.2% | 0.5% |
| Mentions this run | 37 | 3 |
| Positive in AI answers | 51% | 0% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Qwilr 0pp · Upland Qvidian 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Qwilr leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
2 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Qwilr | Upland Qvidian |
|---|---|---|---|
| Compare the leading Proposals & Contracts platforms | Perplexity | #3 | #11 |
| Which Proposals & Contracts vendors do analysts recommend? | Perplexity | #6 | #7 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Qwilr | Upland Qvidian |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | $35 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | No · 14-day trial | — |
| Deployment | Web-based, web-native software | Cloud, hosted on Amazon Web Services |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, PCI-DSS | SOC 2 Type II |
| Support | Email support, Help center, Chat support, Training sessions | — |
| Founded | 2014 | — |
| Headquarters | Redfern, New South Wales, Australia | Austin, Texas |
| Employees | 51–200 | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Series A (AirTree Ventures) · $9M raised | Series B · $31M raised |
| Best for | Sales teams that send proposals, quotes and contracts and want to track buyer engagement. | Sales teams that respond to RFPs and build sales proposals |
Plans side by side
Qwilr
Upland Qvidian
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Qwilr
- Interactive, web-based proposals
- Polished, visually striking proposal presentation
- Frequently shortlisted and highly rated among proposal tools
- Lower cost with annual billing
- 14-day free trial available
Upland Qvidian
- Enterprise-oriented for structured proposal and RFP processes
- Recommended for formal RFPs and security questionnaires
- Suited to large-scale content reuse
- Included in G2's 2026 RFP software recommendations
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Qwilr vs Upland Qvidian”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/qwilr-vs-upland-qvidian, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.