QwilrHelp your worst rep send your best proposals.
vs
WalnutAI for Buyer Enablement, Interactive Demos & Deal Rooms
Comparison · Sales Enablement · weekly run Nov 2
Qwilr vs Walnut
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Qwilr is the stronger AI pick in Sales Enablement: it has a visibility score of 1.5 versus 0 for Walnut.
Choose Qwilr if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (1.5 vs 0)
- You want a lower entry price ($35 vs $575)
- You need PCI-DSS coverage
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
Choose Walnut if…
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Qwilr | Walnut |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.5% | 0% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Sales Enablement | #28 | #55 |
| Share of voice | 0.3% | 0% |
| Mentions this run | 2 | 0 |
| Positive in AI answers | 51% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Qwilr 0pp · Walnut 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Qwilr leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
QwilrWalnut
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Qwilr ranked higher
0Walnut ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Qwilr | Walnut |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | $35 per seat / mo | $575 / mo |
| Free plan | No · 14-day trial | No |
| Deployment | Web-based, web-native software | — |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, PCI-DSS | SOC 2 Type II |
| Support | Email support, Help center, Chat support, Training sessions | Online resources, Email and video support, Dedicated customer success manager on higher plans |
| Founded | 2014 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Redfern, New South Wales, Australia | New York, NY, United States |
| Employees | 51–200 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Series A (AirTree Ventures) · $9M raised | Series B · $56M raised |
| Best for | Sales teams that send proposals, quotes and contracts and want to track buyer engagement. | Sales and solutions engineering teams that send tailored demos to buyers; the Scale plan suits global enterprises standardizing demos across teams. |
Plans side by side
Qwilr
Starter$35user/month, billed annually ($49 monthly)
Growth$55user/month, annual only, min 5 users
Scale$75user/month, annual only, min 10 users
Walnut
Ignite$575month, billed annually
Accelerate$1,550month, billed annually
ScaleCustomcustom
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Qwilr
- Interactive, web-based proposals
- Polished, visually striking proposal presentation
- Frequently shortlisted and highly rated among proposal tools
- Lower cost with annual billing
- 14-day free trial available
Walnut
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Qwilr vs Walnut”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/qwilr-vs-walnut, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.