Reply.io vs Woodpecker
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Reply.io is the stronger AI pick in Sales Engagement: it has a visibility score of 14.4 versus 3.6 for Woodpecker, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Reply.io if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (14.4 vs 3.6)
- AI answers describe it more positively (42% vs 0% positive)
- You need SOC 2 or GDPR coverage
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than usage-based
Choose Woodpecker if…
- You need GDPR 100% compliant (vendor claim) or CCPA 100% compliant (vendor claim) or ISO certified storage or CASA certified: tier 2 coverage
- Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Reply.io | Woodpecker |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 14.4% | 3.6% |
| Change vs last week | down−3.3% | up+2.1% |
| Rank in Sales Engagement | #6 | #21 |
| Share of voice | 3.5% | 0.6% |
| Mentions this run | 23 | 4 |
| Positive in AI answers | 42% | 0% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Reply.io −3.299999999999999pp · Woodpecker +2.1pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Reply.io leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Reply.io | Woodpecker |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which sales engagement platform offers a free trial? | AI Mode | #2 | #8 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Reply.io | Woodpecker |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Usage-based |
| Entry price | $49 / mo | Contact sales |
| Free plan | No · 14-day trial | No · 14-day trial |
| Deployment | — | SaaS |
| Compliance | SOC 2, GDPR | GDPR 100% compliant (vendor claim), CCPA 100% compliant (vendor claim), ISO certified storage, CASA certified: tier 2 |
| Support | Live chat, Email, CSM onboarding | Chat in the bottom right corner of the app, Book a call, Answers to questions within hours |
| Founded | 2014 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | San Jose, California, US | Wroclaw, Poland |
| Employees | 51–200 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Series A | Pre-seed agreement with Xevin Lab (amount not stated) · $0M raised |
| Best for | Founders, sales teams, and agencies who need results fast without juggling 5+ tools. | Businesses that do outbound, including B2B sales teams, SaaS businesses and marketing or lead generation agencies |
Plans side by side
Reply.io
Woodpecker
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Reply.io
- Multichannel outreach and AI-assisted engagement across email, calls, LinkedIn and more
- 14-day free trial to test core sequencing and automation
- Transparent self-serve pricing with annual discounts
- Affordable, lower-cost option
- Strong choice for smaller and mid-market sales teams
Woodpecker
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Reply.io vs Woodpecker”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/reply-io-vs-woodpecker, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.