ResponsiveResponsive AI powers bids, questionnaires, and trust centers with insight, accuracy, and speed.
vs
SAP CPQCloud configure-price-quote software from SAP.
Comparison · Proposals & Contracts · weekly run Nov 2
Responsive vs SAP CPQ
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Responsive is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 10.7 versus 0 for SAP CPQ.
Choose Responsive if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (10.7 vs 0)
- You need GDPR or AICPA SOC 2 or ISO 27001 or ISO 27701 or ISO 42001 or CCPA or STAR Level 1 coverage
- Strong enterprise choice for high-volume RFPs
- Designed for complex enterprise responses
Choose SAP CPQ if…
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (5,000+ employees)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Responsive | SAP CPQ |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 10.7% | 0% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Proposals & Contracts | #10 | #54 |
| Share of voice | 4% | 0% |
| Mentions this run | 20 | 0 |
| Positive in AI answers | 33% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Responsive 0pp · SAP CPQ 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Responsive leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
ResponsiveSAP CPQ
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Responsive ranked higher
0SAP CPQ ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Responsive | SAP CPQ |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | — |
| Entry price | $10,000 / mo | — |
| Free plan | No | — |
| Deployment | Flexible hosting options | Cloud, offered as software-as-a-service, moved to Microsoft Azure data centers as of release 2308 |
| Integrations | 32+ | — |
| Compliance | GDPR, AICPA SOC 2, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, ISO 42001, CCPA, STAR Level 1 | — |
| Support | Professional Services with APMP-certified experts for onboarding and training, Premium deployment and support on Growth and Enterprise editions | — |
| Founded | 2015 | — |
| Headquarters | Frisco, Texas, United States | Walldorf, Germany |
| Employees | 501–1,000 | 5,000+ |
| Funding | Round led by Elevate Capital | — |
| Best for | Dedicated proposal or operations teams with legal, InfoSec and compliance involvement, and global or multi-region operations. | — |
Plans side by side
Responsive
Emerging Edition$10,000year (starting from, platform fee)
Growth EditionCustomyear
Enterprise EditionCustomyear
SAP CPQ
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Responsive
- Strong enterprise choice for high-volume RFPs
- Designed for complex enterprise responses
- Top pick for RFP response management
- Good for security questionnaires and large-scale content reuse
- Recommended in G2's 2026 RFP software list
SAP CPQ
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Responsive vs SAP CPQ”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/responsive-vs-sap-cpq, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.