Skip to content
SlateIndex
SmartRecruitersAI-Powered Hiring Platform That Delivers Results
vs
WorkableAll-in-one HR software
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3

SmartRecruiters vs Workable

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Workable is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 30.1 versus 13.6 for SmartRecruiters, and ranks ahead in 55% of the answers that name both.

Choose SmartRecruiters if…

  • You need TISAX or CCPA or ISO 27001 or UK Cyber Essentials coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
  • Balances consumer-grade candidate experience with enterprise ATS features
  • Suited to high-growth global enterprises

Choose Workable if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (30.1 vs 13.6)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (44% vs 31% positive)
  • You need ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27017 or SOC 3 coverage
  • fast deployment and ease of use

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric SmartRecruiters Workable
Visibility score13.6%30.1%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Recruiting#13#2
Share of voice3.7%7.2%
Mentions this run2138
Positive in AI answers31%44%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3SmartRecruiters 14%

SmartRecruiters 0pp · Workable 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Workable leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
15%
34.1%
AI Mode
4.8%
29.4%
Perplexity
21.1%
26.7%
SmartRecruitersWorkable

Head to head in AI answers

11 engine answers name both brands

5SmartRecruiters ranked higher
6Workable ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionSmartRecruitersWorkable
Pricing model—Flat tiers
Entry price—$299 / mo
Free plan—No · 15-day trial
DeploymentSaaSCloud-based SaaS
Integrations—270+
ComplianceTISAX, CCPA, SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, UK Cyber EssentialsISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3
SupportCommunity & Help Center, Developer DocumentationPriority support on Premier and Enterprise plans
Founded20102012
HeadquartersSan Francisco, CaliforniaBoston, Massachusetts, USA
Employees501–1,000201–500
FundingSeries E · $205M raisedSeries C, led by Zouk Capital · $84M raised
Best forCorporate employers with at least 50 employees and a significant number of open job requisitionsCompanies of any size that care about time-to-value and ease of use and want a system that is fast to implement and easy to adopt, with a focus on small and medium-sized businesses.

Plans side by side

SmartRecruiters

Pricing not available.

Workable

Standard$299month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Premier$599month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Enterprise$719month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Workable pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

SmartRecruiters

  • Balances consumer-grade candidate experience with enterprise ATS features
  • Suited to high-growth global enterprises
  • Modern, collaborative interface
  • Broad, consolidated talent-acquisition suite
  • Enterprise hiring and collaborative applicant tracking platform

    Workable

    • fast deployment and ease of use
    • intuitive automation and candidate tracking
    • transparent pricing and free trial
    • all-in-one ATS and hiring platform
    • candidate sourcing
    • costs more than lightweight ATS options

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “SmartRecruiters vs Workable”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/smartrecruiters-vs-workable, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.