Skip to content
SlateIndex
GreenhouseThe Orchestrated Hiring Ecosystem for the AI era
vs
Spark HireHiring software for lean teams
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3

Greenhouse vs Spark Hire

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Greenhouse is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 38.5 versus 2.6 for Spark Hire, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.

Choose Greenhouse if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (38.5 vs 2.6)
  • You need SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO 27001:2022 or ISO 27701:2019 or ISO 42001:2023 or CCPA/CPRA or PCI DSS coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
  • Strong structured hiring and interview scorecards

Choose Spark Hire if…

  • You need SOC 2 Type II or EEO compliance coverage
  • Recommended as best overall for lean or early-stage startups

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Greenhouse Spark Hire
Visibility score38.5%2.6%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Recruiting#1#32
Share of voice8.1%0.6%
Mentions this run433
Positive in AI answers56%—

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3Greenhouse 39%

Greenhouse 0pp · Spark Hire 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Greenhouse leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
43.5%
3.1%
AI Mode
33.5%
3.7%
Perplexity
38.3%
0.9%
GreenhouseSpark Hire

Head to head in AI answers

1 engine answers name both brands

0Greenhouse ranked higher
1Spark Hire ranked higher
PromptEngineGreenhouseSpark Hire
What are common mistakes when buying a recruiting platform? ChatGPT#4#2

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionGreenhouseSpark Hire
Pricing modelFlat tiersFlat tiers
Entry priceContact sales$335 / mo
Free planNoNo
Integrations—100+
ComplianceSOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001:2022, ISO 27701:2019, ISO 42001:2023, GDPR, CCPA/CPRA, PCI DSSSOC 2 Type II, GDPR, EEO compliance
Support—24x6 support at no charge, Live training and onboarding, Dedicated customer success team
Founded20122010
HeadquartersNew York City, NY, United StatesHighland Park, Illinois, USA
Employees501–1,00051–200
FundingSeries D · $110M raisedVenture round with Stage 2 Capital as an investor
Best forEmployers that want structured, automated hiring across sourcing, interviews and the ATS, from early-stage companies to global enterprisesSmall and medium organizations of about 50 to 500 employees with lean HR or talent acquisition teams

Plans side by side

Greenhouse

CoreCustom
PlusCustom
ProCustom
Greenhouse pricing

Spark Hire

Recruit Pro$335month, billed annually
Recruit Growth$499month, billed annually
Recruit EnterpriseCustom
Spark Hire pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Greenhouse

  • Strong structured hiring and interview scorecards
  • Strong reporting and data visibility
  • Top ratings and popularity for enterprise and mid-market recruiting
  • Integration ecosystem and unified data
  • Reduces hiring bias and supports compliance

    Spark Hire

    • Recommended as best overall for lean or early-stage startups
    • ATS plans require annual contracts

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “Greenhouse vs Spark Hire”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/greenhouse-vs-spark-hire, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.