GreenhouseThe Orchestrated Hiring Ecosystem for the AI era
vs
Spark HireHiring software for lean teams
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3
Greenhouse vs Spark Hire
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Greenhouse is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 38.5 versus 2.6 for Spark Hire, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.
Choose Greenhouse if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (38.5 vs 2.6)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO 27001:2022 or ISO 27701:2019 or ISO 42001:2023 or CCPA/CPRA or PCI DSS coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
- Strong structured hiring and interview scorecards
Choose Spark Hire if…
- You need SOC 2 Type II or EEO compliance coverage
- Recommended as best overall for lean or early-stage startups
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Greenhouse | Spark Hire |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 38.5% | 2.6% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #1 | #32 |
| Share of voice | 8.1% | 0.6% |
| Mentions this run | 43 | 3 |
| Positive in AI answers | 56% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Greenhouse 0pp · Spark Hire 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Greenhouse leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
GreenhouseSpark Hire
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
0Greenhouse ranked higher
1Spark Hire ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Greenhouse | Spark Hire |
|---|---|---|---|
| What are common mistakes when buying a recruiting platform? | ChatGPT | #4 | #2 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Greenhouse | Spark Hire |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | Contact sales | $335 / mo |
| Free plan | No | No |
| Integrations | — | 100+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001:2022, ISO 27701:2019, ISO 42001:2023, GDPR, CCPA/CPRA, PCI DSS | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, EEO compliance |
| Support | — | 24x6 support at no charge, Live training and onboarding, Dedicated customer success team |
| Founded | 2012 | 2010 |
| Headquarters | New York City, NY, United States | Highland Park, Illinois, USA |
| Employees | 501–1,000 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Series D · $110M raised | Venture round with Stage 2 Capital as an investor |
| Best for | Employers that want structured, automated hiring across sourcing, interviews and the ATS, from early-stage companies to global enterprises | Small and medium organizations of about 50 to 500 employees with lean HR or talent acquisition teams |
Plans side by side
Spark Hire
Recruit Pro$335month, billed annually
Recruit Growth$499month, billed annually
Recruit EnterpriseCustom
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Greenhouse
- Strong structured hiring and interview scorecards
- Strong reporting and data visibility
- Top ratings and popularity for enterprise and mid-market recruiting
- Integration ecosystem and unified data
- Reduces hiring bias and supports compliance
Spark Hire
- Recommended as best overall for lean or early-stage startups
- ATS plans require annual contracts
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Greenhouse vs Spark Hire”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/greenhouse-vs-spark-hire, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.