TestGorillaFind great talent. Prove they can do the job.
vs
WorkableAll-in-one HR software
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3
TestGorilla vs Workable
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Workable is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 30.1 versus 0.6 for TestGorilla.
Choose TestGorilla if…
- You want a free plan to start
- You need GDPR compliant or SOC 2 Type II compliant coverage
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
- automated sending of tests and automatic score return
Choose Workable if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (30.1 vs 0.6)
- You need ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27017 or SOC 2 Type II or SOC 3 coverage
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
- fast deployment and ease of use
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | TestGorilla | Workable |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.6% | 30.1% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #59 | #2 |
| Share of voice | 0.4% | 7.2% |
| Mentions this run | 2 | 38 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 44% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
TestGorilla 0pp · Workable 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Workable leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
TestGorillaWorkable
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0TestGorilla ranked higher
0Workable ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | TestGorilla | Workable |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $74 per seat / mo | $299 / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | No · 15-day trial |
| Deployment | — | Cloud-based SaaS |
| Integrations | — | 270+ |
| Compliance | GDPR compliant, SOC 2 Type II compliant | ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3 |
| Support | Help center, 24/7 live chat, Email support, Digital onboarding guides | Priority support on Premier and Enterprise plans |
| Founded | 2020 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Amsterdam, Netherlands | Boston, Massachusetts, USA |
| Employees | 201–500 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Series A · $80M raised | Series C, led by Zouk Capital · $84M raised |
| Best for | Small companies with limited hiring needs (Core plan) and larger teams screening candidates at scale (Plus plan). | Companies of any size that care about time-to-value and ease of use and want a system that is fast to implement and easy to adopt, with a focus on small and medium-sized businesses. |
Plans side by side
TestGorilla
Gorilla Sourcing Free$0month
Gorilla Sourcing Core$74per Sourcing seat per month, billed annually
Gorilla Sourcing Plus$134per Sourcing seat per month, billed annually
Gorilla Assessments Free$0month
Gorilla Assessments Core$215per account per month, billed annually (from)
Gorilla Assessments Plus$520per account per month, billed annually (from)
Workable
Standard$299month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Premier$599month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Enterprise$719month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
TestGorilla
- automated sending of tests and automatic score return
Workable
- fast deployment and ease of use
- intuitive automation and candidate tracking
- transparent pricing and free trial
- all-in-one ATS and hiring platform
- candidate sourcing
- costs more than lightweight ATS options
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “TestGorilla vs Workable”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/testgorilla-vs-workable, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.