100HiresAI Recruiting Software for Small Business
vs
GemBetter recruiting, built on Gem.
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3
100Hires vs Gem
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Gem is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 5.1 versus 2 for 100Hires.
Choose 100Hires if…
- You want a lower entry price ($49 vs $130)
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
- Intuitive, AI-forward ATS well suited to startups and small-to-medium teams
- Affordable and easy to use for small and midsize teams
Choose Gem if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (5.1 vs 2)
- AI answers describe it more positively (33% vs 25% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type II coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (51–200 employees)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | 100Hires | Gem |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 2% | 5.1% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #38 | #19 |
| Share of voice | 0.5% | 1.7% |
| Mentions this run | 3 | 10 |
| Positive in AI answers | 25% | 33% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
100Hires 0pp · Gem 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Gem leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
100HiresGem
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0100Hires ranked higher
0Gem ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | 100Hires | Gem |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Per seat |
| Entry price | $49 / mo | $130 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No · 14-day trial | No |
| Deployment | Cloud-hosted, with servers in the US and Europe | Web application and Chrome extension |
| Compliance | — | SOC 2 Type II |
| Support | Email support, Chat support, Online knowledge base, Video tutorials | Onshore support, success and development team |
| Founded | 2019 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | San Diego, California, United States | — |
| Employees | 11–50 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Seed | Series C · $148M raised |
| Best for | Small businesses and startups that hire through job boards and inbound applicants | Growing talent acquisition teams, from startups to global enterprises, that want sourcing, ATS and CRM in one platform or AI layered onto an existing ATS. |
Plans side by side
100Hires
Start$49per month, billed annually
Advanced$199per month, billed annually
Pro$399per month, billed annually
EnterpriseCustomcontact sales
Gem
Gem + Your ATSCustomCustom pricing based on company FTE count
Gem All-in-OneCustomCustom pricing based on company FTE count
Gem Startup Program$130per month, billed yearly
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
100Hires
- Intuitive, AI-forward ATS well suited to startups and small-to-medium teams
- Affordable and easy to use for small and midsize teams
- Strong overall reviews with high rating and large review base
Gem
- Strong option for recruiting teams in 2026
- Startup discount on yearly billing
- Candidate sourcing and interview management
- Career websites and candidate engagement
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “100Hires vs Gem”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/100hires-vs-gem, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.