100HiresAI Recruiting Software for Small Business
vs
WorkableAll-in-one HR software
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3
100Hires vs Workable
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Workable is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 30.1 versus 2 for 100Hires, and ranks ahead in 50% of the answers that name both.
Choose 100Hires if…
- You want a lower entry price ($49 vs $299)
- Intuitive, AI-forward ATS well suited to startups and small-to-medium teams
- Affordable and easy to use for small and midsize teams
- Strong overall reviews with high rating and large review base
Choose Workable if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (30.1 vs 2)
- AI answers describe it more positively (44% vs 25% positive)
- You need ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27017 or SOC 2 Type II or SOC 3 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | 100Hires | Workable |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 2% | 30.1% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #38 | #2 |
| Share of voice | 0.5% | 7.2% |
| Mentions this run | 3 | 38 |
| Positive in AI answers | 25% | 44% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
100Hires 0pp · Workable 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Workable leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
100HiresWorkable
Head to head in AI answers
2 engine answers name both brands
1100Hires ranked higher
1Workable ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | 100Hires | Workable |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alternatives to the most popular recruiting platform | Perplexity | #14 | #6 |
| Is 100Hires a good recruiting platform? | ChatGPT | #1 | #2 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | 100Hires | Workable |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | $49 / mo | $299 / mo |
| Free plan | No · 14-day trial | No · 15-day trial |
| Deployment | Cloud-hosted, with servers in the US and Europe | Cloud-based SaaS |
| Integrations | — | 270+ |
| Compliance | — | ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3 |
| Support | Email support, Chat support, Online knowledge base, Video tutorials | Priority support on Premier and Enterprise plans |
| Founded | 2019 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | San Diego, California, United States | Boston, Massachusetts, USA |
| Employees | 11–50 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Seed | Series C, led by Zouk Capital · $84M raised |
| Best for | Small businesses and startups that hire through job boards and inbound applicants | Companies of any size that care about time-to-value and ease of use and want a system that is fast to implement and easy to adopt, with a focus on small and medium-sized businesses. |
Plans side by side
100Hires
Start$49per month, billed annually
Advanced$199per month, billed annually
Pro$399per month, billed annually
EnterpriseCustomcontact sales
Workable
Standard$299month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Premier$599month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Enterprise$719month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
100Hires
- Intuitive, AI-forward ATS well suited to startups and small-to-medium teams
- Affordable and easy to use for small and midsize teams
- Strong overall reviews with high rating and large review base
Workable
- fast deployment and ease of use
- intuitive automation and candidate tracking
- transparent pricing and free trial
- all-in-one ATS and hiring platform
- candidate sourcing
- costs more than lightweight ATS options
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “100Hires vs Workable”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/100hires-vs-workable, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.