Skip to content
SlateIndex
100HiresAI Recruiting Software for Small Business
vs
WorkableAll-in-one HR software
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3

100Hires vs Workable

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Workable is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 30.1 versus 2 for 100Hires, and ranks ahead in 50% of the answers that name both.

Choose 100Hires if…

  • You want a lower entry price ($49 vs $299)
  • Intuitive, AI-forward ATS well suited to startups and small-to-medium teams
  • Affordable and easy to use for small and midsize teams
  • Strong overall reviews with high rating and large review base

Choose Workable if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (30.1 vs 2)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (44% vs 25% positive)
  • You need ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27017 or SOC 2 Type II or SOC 3 coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric 100Hires Workable
Visibility score2%30.1%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Recruiting#38#2
Share of voice0.5%7.2%
Mentions this run338
Positive in AI answers25%44%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3100Hires 2%

100Hires 0pp · Workable 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Workable leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
0%
34.1%
AI Mode
0%
29.4%
Perplexity
5.9%
26.7%
100HiresWorkable

Head to head in AI answers

2 engine answers name both brands

1100Hires ranked higher
1Workable ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

Dimension100HiresWorkable
Pricing modelFlat tiersFlat tiers
Entry price$49 / mo$299 / mo
Free planNo · 14-day trialNo · 15-day trial
DeploymentCloud-hosted, with servers in the US and EuropeCloud-based SaaS
Integrations—270+
Compliance—ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3
SupportEmail support, Chat support, Online knowledge base, Video tutorialsPriority support on Premier and Enterprise plans
Founded20192012
HeadquartersSan Diego, California, United StatesBoston, Massachusetts, USA
Employees11–50201–500
FundingSeedSeries C, led by Zouk Capital · $84M raised
Best forSmall businesses and startups that hire through job boards and inbound applicantsCompanies of any size that care about time-to-value and ease of use and want a system that is fast to implement and easy to adopt, with a focus on small and medium-sized businesses.

Plans side by side

100Hires

Start$49per month, billed annually
Advanced$199per month, billed annually
Pro$399per month, billed annually
EnterpriseCustomcontact sales
100Hires pricing

Workable

Standard$299month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Premier$599month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Enterprise$719month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Workable pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

100Hires

  • Intuitive, AI-forward ATS well suited to startups and small-to-medium teams
  • Affordable and easy to use for small and midsize teams
  • Strong overall reviews with high rating and large review base

    Workable

    • fast deployment and ease of use
    • intuitive automation and candidate tracking
    • transparent pricing and free trial
    • all-in-one ATS and hiring platform
    • candidate sourcing
    • costs more than lightweight ATS options

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “100Hires vs Workable”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/100hires-vs-workable, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.