Skip to content
SlateIndex
Act-OnMarketing automation for your entire customer lifecycle
vs
BloomreachThe AI Platform for Personalization
Comparison · Marketing Automation · weekly run Nov 2

Act-On vs Bloomreach

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Bloomreach is the stronger AI pick in Marketing Automation: it has a visibility score of 1.9 versus 1 for Act-On, and ranks ahead in 50% of the answers that name both.

Choose Act-On if…

  • AI answers describe it more positively (33% vs 0% positive)
  • Favored for mid-market demand generation
  • Lower total cost of ownership
  • Fast deployment

Choose Bloomreach if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (1.9 vs 1)
  • You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 or ISO 27017 or ISO 27018 or ISO 9001 or ISO 22301 or GDPR or CCPA coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
  • included in analyst-backed marketing automation shortlist

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 2

Metric Act-On Bloomreach
Visibility score1%1.9%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Marketing Automation#31#27
Share of voice0.5%0.7%
Mentions this run34
Positive in AI answers33%0%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Act-On 1%

Act-On 0pp · Bloomreach 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Bloomreach leads on 2 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
1.9%
2.6%
AI Mode
1.1%
0%
Perplexity
0%
3%
Act-OnBloomreach

Head to head in AI answers

2 engine answers name both brands

1Act-On ranked higher
1Bloomreach ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionAct-OnBloomreach
Pricing modelUsage-basedUsage-based
Entry price$900 / moContact sales
Free planNoNo
Integrations—175+
Compliance—SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, ISO 9001, ISO 22301, GDPR, CCPA
SupportStandard support package with email-based support, Premium support package, recommended for EnterpriseIn-app chat with a 90-second average response, 24/7, Named Customer Success Manager, Bloomreach Academy, Monthly best-practice sessions
Founded20082009
HeadquartersPortland, Oregon, United StatesMountain View, California, United States
Employees201–500501–1,000
FundingRound of $4M, about six months before the 2011 Series C · $82M raisedSeries D, from Bain Capital Ventures, Battery Ventures, Lightspeed, NEA and Salesforce Ventures
Best forMidsize and enterprise marketing teams focused on growing revenue through lifecycle marketing, including distributed organizations such as franchises and branch offices.Brands at scale that send high volumes of email and SMS, run ecommerce, and hold customer data spread across systems. Most customers invest $60K or more a year.

Plans side by side

Act-On

Professional$900month (2,500 active contacts/month)
EnterpriseCustomcustom quote
Act-On pricing

Bloomreach

Email (ESP)Customyear, custom quote
Marketing AutomationCustomyear, custom quote
Ecommerce SearchCustomyear, custom quote
Marketing AgentCustomyear, custom quote
Shopping AgentCustomyear, custom quote
Loomi ConnectCustomyear, custom quote
Bloomreach pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Act-On

  • Favored for mid-market demand generation
  • Lower total cost of ownership
  • Fast deployment

    Bloomreach

    • included in analyst-backed marketing automation shortlist

      Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

      Cite as: SlateIndex, “Act-On vs Bloomreach”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/act-on-vs-bloomreach, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.