Act-OnMarketing automation for your entire customer lifecycle
vs
BloomreachThe AI Platform for Personalization
Comparison · Marketing Automation · weekly run Nov 2
Act-On vs Bloomreach
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Bloomreach is the stronger AI pick in Marketing Automation: it has a visibility score of 1.9 versus 1 for Act-On, and ranks ahead in 50% of the answers that name both.
Choose Act-On if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (33% vs 0% positive)
- Favored for mid-market demand generation
- Lower total cost of ownership
- Fast deployment
Choose Bloomreach if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (1.9 vs 1)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 or ISO 27017 or ISO 27018 or ISO 9001 or ISO 22301 or GDPR or CCPA coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
- included in analyst-backed marketing automation shortlist
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Act-On | Bloomreach |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1% | 1.9% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Marketing Automation | #31 | #27 |
| Share of voice | 0.5% | 0.7% |
| Mentions this run | 3 | 4 |
| Positive in AI answers | 33% | 0% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Act-On 0pp · Bloomreach 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Bloomreach leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
Act-OnBloomreach
Head to head in AI answers
2 engine answers name both brands
1Act-On ranked higher
1Bloomreach ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Act-On | Bloomreach |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which marketing automation vendors do analysts recommend? | ChatGPT | #12 | #5 |
| Official website of the top marketing automation platform vendors | ChatGPT | #14 | #18 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Act-On | Bloomreach |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Usage-based |
| Entry price | $900 / mo | Contact sales |
| Free plan | No | No |
| Integrations | — | 175+ |
| Compliance | — | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, ISO 9001, ISO 22301, GDPR, CCPA |
| Support | Standard support package with email-based support, Premium support package, recommended for Enterprise | In-app chat with a 90-second average response, 24/7, Named Customer Success Manager, Bloomreach Academy, Monthly best-practice sessions |
| Founded | 2008 | 2009 |
| Headquarters | Portland, Oregon, United States | Mountain View, California, United States |
| Employees | 201–500 | 501–1,000 |
| Funding | Round of $4M, about six months before the 2011 Series C · $82M raised | Series D, from Bain Capital Ventures, Battery Ventures, Lightspeed, NEA and Salesforce Ventures |
| Best for | Midsize and enterprise marketing teams focused on growing revenue through lifecycle marketing, including distributed organizations such as franchises and branch offices. | Brands at scale that send high volumes of email and SMS, run ecommerce, and hold customer data spread across systems. Most customers invest $60K or more a year. |
Plans side by side
Bloomreach
Email (ESP)Customyear, custom quote
Marketing AutomationCustomyear, custom quote
Ecommerce SearchCustomyear, custom quote
Marketing AgentCustomyear, custom quote
Shopping AgentCustomyear, custom quote
Loomi ConnectCustomyear, custom quote
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Act-On
- Favored for mid-market demand generation
- Lower total cost of ownership
- Fast deployment
Bloomreach
- included in analyst-backed marketing automation shortlist
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Act-On vs Bloomreach”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/act-on-vs-bloomreach, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.