Act-OnMarketing automation for your entire customer lifecycle
vs
Customer.ioCustomer Engagement Platform For Better Outcomes
Comparison · Marketing Automation · weekly run Nov 2
Act-On vs Customer.io
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Customer.io is the stronger AI pick in Marketing Automation: it has a visibility score of 12.2 versus 1 for Act-On, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Act-On if…
- Favored for mid-market demand generation
- Lower total cost of ownership
- Fast deployment
Choose Customer.io if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (12.2 vs 1)
- You want a lower entry price ($100 vs $900)
- AI answers describe it more positively (34% vs 33% positive)
- You need GDPR or CCPA or ISO 27001 or SOC 2 Type II or HIPAA coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Act-On | Customer.io |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1% | 12.2% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Marketing Automation | #31 | #8 |
| Share of voice | 0.5% | 4% |
| Mentions this run | 3 | 23 |
| Positive in AI answers | 33% | 34% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Act-On 0pp · Customer.io 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Customer.io leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
Act-OnCustomer.io
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
0Act-On ranked higher
1Customer.io ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Act-On | Customer.io |
|---|---|---|---|
| Official website of the top marketing automation platform vendors | ChatGPT | #14 | #10 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Act-On | Customer.io |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Usage-based |
| Entry price | $900 / mo | $100 / mo |
| Free plan | No | No |
| Deployment | — | Cloud-hosted, with US and EU data centers |
| Compliance | — | GDPR, CCPA, ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA |
| Support | Standard support package with email-based support, Premium support package, recommended for Enterprise | Email and chat support, Documentation and community support, Dedicated Customer Success Manager on Enterprise |
| Founded | 2008 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Portland, Oregon, United States | Portland, Oregon, USA |
| Employees | 201–500 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Round of $4M, about six months before the 2011 Series C · $82M raised | Series A led by Spectrum Equity |
| Best for | Midsize and enterprise marketing teams focused on growing revenue through lifecycle marketing, including distributed organizations such as franchises and branch offices. | Teams getting started with data-driven messaging, and teams scaling across channels with custom workflows. |
Plans side by side
Customer.io
Essentials$100month, billed monthly (starts at, 5k profiles)
Premium$1,000month, billed yearly (starts at)
EnterpriseCustomcontact sales
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Act-On
- Favored for mid-market demand generation
- Lower total cost of ownership
- Fast deployment
Customer.io
- Strong behavioral and event-driven automation
- Well suited to product-led SaaS companies
- Supports onboarding, activation and retention messaging
- Frequently shortlisted as a top marketing automation choice
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Act-On vs Customer.io”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/act-on-vs-customer-io, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.