Act-OnMarketing automation for your entire customer lifecycle
vs
n8nFlexible AI workflow automation for technical teams.
Comparison · Marketing Automation · weekly run Nov 2
Act-On vs n8n
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Act-On is the stronger AI pick in Marketing Automation: it has a visibility score of 1 versus 0.9 for n8n.
Choose Act-On if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (1 vs 0.9)
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
- Favored for mid-market demand generation
- Lower total cost of ownership
Choose n8n if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (57% vs 33% positive)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 2 or GDPR coverage
- Avoids vendor lock-in and offers self-hosting
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Act-On | n8n |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1% | 0.9% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Marketing Automation | #31 | #33 |
| Share of voice | 0.5% | 0.2% |
| Mentions this run | 3 | 1 |
| Positive in AI answers | 33% | 57% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Act-On 0pp · n8n 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Act-On leads on 1 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
Act-Onn8n
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Act-On ranked higher
0n8n ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Act-On | n8n |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | — |
| Entry price | $900 / mo | — |
| Free plan | No | — |
| Deployment | — | Hosted on n8n Cloud or self-hosted on-prem or with Docker. |
| Integrations | — | 2000+ |
| Compliance | — | SOC 2, GDPR |
| Support | Standard support package with email-based support, Premium support package, recommended for Enterprise | Forum support on all plans, Email support on Enterprise, Dedicated support with SLA on Enterprise |
| Founded | 2008 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | Portland, Oregon, United States | Berlin, Germany |
| Employees | 201–500 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Round of $4M, about six months before the 2011 Series C · $82M raised | Series C · $240M raised |
| Best for | Midsize and enterprise marketing teams focused on growing revenue through lifecycle marketing, including distributed organizations such as franchises and branch offices. | Technical teams that want the flexibility of code with the speed of no-code. |
Plans side by side
n8n
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Act-On
- Favored for mid-market demand generation
- Lower total cost of ownership
- Fast deployment
n8n
- Avoids vendor lock-in and offers self-hosting
- Excellent low-code visual workflow automation
- Strong native AI agent and MCP support
- Broad integrations across SaaS apps and APIs
- Free self-hosted edition and affordable cloud plans
- Self-hosting requires technical skill such as Docker or server management
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Act-On vs n8n”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/act-on-vs-n8n, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.