Skip to content
SlateIndex
ActiveCampaignAutonomous marketing platform for email, SMS and WhatsApp
vs
IterableAI Customer Engagement Platform for Real-Time, Personalized Experiences
Comparison · Marketing Automation · weekly run Nov 2

ActiveCampaign vs Iterable

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

ActiveCampaign is the stronger AI pick in Marketing Automation: it has a visibility score of 44 versus 3.6 for Iterable, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.

Choose ActiveCampaign if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (44 vs 3.6)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (53% vs 29% positive)
  • You need GDPR or SOC 2 coverage
  • advanced marketing automation

Choose Iterable if…

  • You need SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO 27001 or Data Privacy Framework or Global Cross-Border Privacy Rules or Global Privacy Rules for Processors coverage
  • Good fit for growth-stage, retail, and media organizations running cross-channel campaigns
  • Suited to high-growth, mobile-heavy consumer startups needing real-time multi-channel engagement
  • Strong for product-led growth and behavioral, real-time cross-channel messaging

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 2

Metric ActiveCampaign Iterable
Visibility score44%3.6%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Marketing Automation#2#20
Share of voice9.3%1.6%
Mentions this run519
Positive in AI answers53%29%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2ActiveCampaign 44%

ActiveCampaign 0pp · Iterable 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

ActiveCampaign leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
43.7%
3.9%
AI Mode
47.6%
2.4%
Perplexity
40.7%
4.4%
ActiveCampaignIterable

Head to head in AI answers

6 engine answers name both brands

6ActiveCampaign ranked higher
0Iterable ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionActiveCampaignIterable
Pricing modelFlat tiers—
Entry priceContact sales—
Free planNo—
Onboarding feeIncluded—
Integrations1000+—
ComplianceGDPR, SOC 2, HIPAASOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, Data Privacy Framework, Global Cross-Border Privacy Rules, Global Privacy Rules for Processors
SupportHelp center, FAQs, Support request form, Dedicated account team on Enterprise planCommunity and expert-led programs
Founded20032013
HeadquartersChicago, Illinois, United StatesSan Francisco, California
Employees501–1,000501–1,000
FundingSeries C · $360M raisedSeries E · $342M raised
Best forSmall teams and growing businesses that want AI to run everyday email, SMS and WhatsApp marketingGlobal brands that want marketers to run real-time, cross-channel engagement without engineering dependency.

Plans side by side

ActiveCampaign

StarterCustommonth, billed yearly for 1,000 contacts
PlusCustommonth, billed yearly for 1,000 contacts
ProCustommonth, billed yearly for 1,000 contacts
EnterpriseCustommonth, billed yearly for 1,000 contacts
ActiveCampaign pricing

Iterable

Pricing not available.

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

ActiveCampaign

  • advanced marketing automation
  • deep CRM integration
  • behavioral and lifecycle automation
  • strong email marketing platform
  • affordable pricing with annual discount
  • charges for total stored prospect records

Iterable

  • Good fit for growth-stage, retail, and media organizations running cross-channel campaigns
  • Suited to high-growth, mobile-heavy consumer startups needing real-time multi-channel engagement
  • Strong for product-led growth and behavioral, real-time cross-channel messaging
  • Named among leading analyst-backed marketing automation shortlists
  • Good choice for high-scale consumer engagement
  • Pricing not transparent; generally requires custom quotes

Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

Cite as: SlateIndex, “ActiveCampaign vs Iterable”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/activecampaign-vs-iterable, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.