ActiveCampaignAutonomous marketing platform for email, SMS and WhatsApp
vs
Reply.ioAI Sales Outreach & Cold Email Platform
Comparison · Sales Engagement · weekly run Nov 3
ActiveCampaign vs Reply.io
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Reply.io is the stronger AI pick in Sales Engagement: it has a visibility score of 14.4 versus 0.3 for ActiveCampaign.
Choose ActiveCampaign if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (53% vs 42% positive)
- You need HIPAA coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
- advanced marketing automation
Choose Reply.io if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (14.4 vs 0.3)
- Multichannel outreach and AI-assisted engagement across email, calls, LinkedIn and more
- 14-day free trial to test core sequencing and automation
- Transparent self-serve pricing with annual discounts
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | ActiveCampaign | Reply.io |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.3% | 14.4% |
| Change vs last week | no change0% | down−3.3% |
| Rank in Sales Engagement | #43 | #6 |
| Share of voice | 0.1% | 3.5% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 23 |
| Positive in AI answers | 53% | 42% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
ActiveCampaign 0pp · Reply.io −3.299999999999999pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Reply.io leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
ActiveCampaignReply.io
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0ActiveCampaign ranked higher
0Reply.io ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | ActiveCampaign | Reply.io |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | Contact sales | $49 / mo |
| Free plan | No | No · 14-day trial |
| Onboarding fee | Included | — |
| Integrations | 1000+ | — |
| Compliance | GDPR, SOC 2, HIPAA | SOC 2, GDPR |
| Support | Help center, FAQs, Support request form, Dedicated account team on Enterprise plan | Live chat, Email, CSM onboarding |
| Founded | 2003 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Chicago, Illinois, United States | San Jose, California, US |
| Employees | 501–1,000 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Series C · $360M raised | Series A |
| Best for | Small teams and growing businesses that want AI to run everyday email, SMS and WhatsApp marketing | Founders, sales teams, and agencies who need results fast without juggling 5+ tools. |
Plans side by side
ActiveCampaign
StarterCustommonth, billed yearly for 1,000 contacts
PlusCustommonth, billed yearly for 1,000 contacts
ProCustommonth, billed yearly for 1,000 contacts
EnterpriseCustommonth, billed yearly for 1,000 contacts
Reply.io
Email Volume$49month, billed annually (1,000 active contacts; monthly $59)
Multichannel$89user/month, billed annually (monthly $99)
AI SDR Starter$500month, billed annually (1,000 active contacts; monthly $800)
AI SDR Growth$1,500month, billed annually (5,000 active contacts; monthly $2500)
AI SDR EnterpriseCustomcontact us
Agency Core$210month
Agency AI SDR$500month/client
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
ActiveCampaign
- advanced marketing automation
- deep CRM integration
- behavioral and lifecycle automation
- strong email marketing platform
- affordable pricing with annual discount
- charges for total stored prospect records
Reply.io
- Multichannel outreach and AI-assisted engagement across email, calls, LinkedIn and more
- 14-day free trial to test core sequencing and automation
- Transparent self-serve pricing with annual discounts
- Affordable, lower-cost option
- Strong choice for smaller and mid-market sales teams
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “ActiveCampaign vs Reply.io”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/activecampaign-vs-reply-io, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.