ActiveCampaignAutonomous marketing platform for email, SMS and WhatsApp
vs
RoxRevenue Agents for the Global 2000
Comparison · Sales Engagement · weekly run Nov 3
ActiveCampaign vs Rox
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Rox is the stronger AI pick in Sales Engagement: it has a visibility score of 6.8 versus 0.3 for ActiveCampaign.
Choose ActiveCampaign if…
- You need SOC 2 or HIPAA coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than usage-based
- advanced marketing automation
Choose Rox if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (6.8 vs 0.3)
- You want a free plan to start
- You need SOC 2 Type II coverage
- Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | ActiveCampaign | Rox |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.3% | 6.8% |
| Change vs last week | no change0% | New |
| Rank in Sales Engagement | #43 | #17 |
| Share of voice | 0.1% | 2% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 15 |
| Positive in AI answers | 53% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
ActiveCampaign 0pp · Rox +6.8pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Rox leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
ActiveCampaignRox
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0ActiveCampaign ranked higher
0Rox ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | ActiveCampaign | Rox |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Usage-based |
| Entry price | Contact sales | Free; paid from $100 / mo |
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Onboarding fee | Included | — |
| Deployment | — | Cloud, with infrastructure running on AWS |
| Integrations | 1000+ | — |
| Compliance | GDPR, SOC 2, HIPAA | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR |
| Support | Help center, FAQs, Support request form, Dedicated account team on Enterprise plan | Dedicated deployment and support team on the Enterprise plan |
| Founded | 2003 | 2024 |
| Headquarters | Chicago, Illinois, United States | San Francisco, CA, United States |
| Employees | 501–1,000 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Series C · $360M raised | Round at about $1.2B valuation, led by General Catalyst (reported from unnamed sources) · $50M raised |
| Best for | Small teams and growing businesses that want AI to run everyday email, SMS and WhatsApp marketing | Global 2000 enterprise revenue teams |
Plans side by side
ActiveCampaign
StarterCustommonth, billed yearly for 1,000 contacts
PlusCustommonth, billed yearly for 1,000 contacts
ProCustommonth, billed yearly for 1,000 contacts
EnterpriseCustommonth, billed yearly for 1,000 contacts
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
ActiveCampaign
- advanced marketing automation
- deep CRM integration
- behavioral and lifecycle automation
- strong email marketing platform
- affordable pricing with annual discount
- charges for total stored prospect records
Rox
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “ActiveCampaign vs Rox”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/activecampaign-vs-rox, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.