Skip to content
SlateIndex
ApolloThe AI GTM System for Go-to-Market Teams
vs
GongSales Enablement
Comparison · Sales Engagement · weekly run Nov 3

Apollo vs Gong

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Apollo is the stronger AI pick in Sales Engagement: it has a visibility score of 51 versus 5.6 for Gong, and ranks ahead in 92% of the answers that name both.

Choose Apollo if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (51 vs 5.6)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (60% vs 39% positive)
  • You need GDPR or SOC 2 or CCPA or CASA Tier 2 or CPRA or EU-US DPF coverage
  • Large B2B contact database combined with prospecting and email sequencing

Choose Gong if…

  • You need more native integrations (300+ vs 200+)
  • You need SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO/IEC 27017 or ISO/IEC 27018 or ISO/IEC 27701 or ISO/IEC 42001 or CSA STAR Registry or EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
  • Strong conversation intelligence for call capture and analysis

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Apollo Gong
Visibility score51%5.6%
Change vs last weekdown−2.8%down−0.6%
Rank in Sales Engagement#4#19
Share of voice9.4%2%
Mentions this run5913
Positive in AI answers60%39%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Nov 3Apollo 51%

Apollo −2.799999999999997pp · Gong −0.6000000000000005pp over 1 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Apollo leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
70.6%
8.7%
AI Mode
39.1%
3%
Perplexity
43.3%
5.2%
ApolloGong

Head to head in AI answers

13 engine answers name both brands

12Apollo ranked higher
1Gong ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionApolloGong
Pricing modelPer seat—
Entry priceContact sales—
Free planYes—
DeploymentCloud platform—
Integrations200+300+
ComplianceGDPR, SOC 2, CCPA, ISO/IEC 27001, CASA Tier 2, CPRA, EU-US DPF, PCI DSSSOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018, ISO/IEC 27701, ISO/IEC 42001, PCI DSS, CSA STAR Registry, EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework
SupportEmail support at support@apollo.io, Dedicated support on Custom plans, Sales team for Custom plan discussions—
Founded20152015
HeadquartersSan Francisco, CASan Francisco, California
Employees501–1,0001,001–5,000
FundingSeries D · $250M raisedSeries E · $584M raised
Best forSales and go-to-market teams that run prospecting, outreach and dialing and want data, AI and execution in one systemSales, revenue and enablement teams at enterprises, including high-performing revenue teams in every industry

Plans side by side

Apollo

Free$0
BasicCustom
ProfessionalCustom
CustomCustom
Apollo pricing

Gong

Pricing not available.

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Apollo

  • Large B2B contact database combined with prospecting and email sequencing
  • Transparent self-serve per-user pricing with a free tier
  • Strong all-in-one value for prospecting and outreach
  • Affordable, reliable choice for small teams and startups
  • Widely used and highly rated by reviewers

    Gong

    • Strong conversation intelligence for call capture and analysis
    • Useful coaching insights from sales calls
    • Deal inspection and revenue insights
    • Seen as an industry heavyweight and critical enablement infrastructure
    • Less suited than dedicated tools for sequencing alone

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “Apollo vs Gong”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/apollo-vs-gong, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.