ApplicantStackThe affordable, easy-to-use online applicant tracking system and employee onboarding system.
vs
AshbyAll-in-one recruiting software for ambitious teams
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3
ApplicantStack vs Ashby
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Ashby is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 17.4 versus 1.4 for ApplicantStack, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose ApplicantStack if…
- You want a lower entry price ($29.99 vs $400)
- Budget-friendly entry-level pricing
- Discounted annual prepayment option
Choose Ashby if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (17.4 vs 1.4)
- You need SOC 2 Type II coverage
- Deep data visibility
- Advanced analytics and detailed funnel reporting
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | ApplicantStack | Ashby |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.4% | 17.4% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #49 | #7 |
| Share of voice | 0.4% | 3.8% |
| Mentions this run | 2 | 21 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 57% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
ApplicantStack 0pp · Ashby 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Ashby leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
ApplicantStackAshby
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
0ApplicantStack ranked higher
1Ashby ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | ApplicantStack | Ashby |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which recruiting tools offer annual discounts? | ChatGPT | #11 | #10 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | ApplicantStack | Ashby |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | $29.99 / mo | $400 / mo |
| Free plan | No · 14-day trial | No |
| Deployment | Online, with no software installation required | Cloud-hosted software as a service on Amazon Web Services, sold on subscription plans |
| Integrations | — | 250+ |
| Compliance | — | SOC 2 Type II |
| Support | Support staff during standard business hours, Online help center, getting started guides and videos, Curated knowledge base | Customer success team |
| Founded | — | 2018 |
| Headquarters | — | San Francisco, CA, United States |
| Employees | — | 201–500 |
| Funding | — | Series D · $120M raised |
| Best for | Small and mid-sized businesses, including start-ups and organizations with low-volume hiring needs | Ambitious, scaling companies from startups to enterprises that want one system for hiring |
Plans side by side
ApplicantStack
Starter$29.99per month
Growth$49.99per month
Recruit$109.99per month
Bundle$159.99per month
Ashby
All-In-One Foundations$400month
All-In-One PlusCustomcontact sales
All-In-One EnterpriseCustomcontact sales
Ashby AnalyticsCustomusage-based
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
ApplicantStack
- Budget-friendly entry-level pricing
- Discounted annual prepayment option
Ashby
- Deep data visibility
- Advanced analytics and detailed funnel reporting
- Strong fit for well-funded, scaling tech startups
- Good for data-driven recruiting teams
- Strong shortlist choice for recruiting software
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “ApplicantStack vs Ashby”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/applicantstack-vs-ashby, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.