ApplicantStackThe affordable, easy-to-use online applicant tracking system and employee onboarding system.
vs
GreenhouseThe Orchestrated Hiring Ecosystem for the AI era
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3
ApplicantStack vs Greenhouse
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Greenhouse is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 38.5 versus 1.4 for ApplicantStack.
Choose ApplicantStack if…
- Budget-friendly entry-level pricing
- Discounted annual prepayment option
Choose Greenhouse if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (38.5 vs 1.4)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO 27001:2022 or ISO 27701:2019 or ISO 42001:2023 or GDPR or CCPA/CPRA or PCI DSS coverage
- Strong structured hiring and interview scorecards
- Strong reporting and data visibility
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | ApplicantStack | Greenhouse |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.4% | 38.5% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #49 | #1 |
| Share of voice | 0.4% | 8.1% |
| Mentions this run | 2 | 43 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 56% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
ApplicantStack 0pp · Greenhouse 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Greenhouse leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
ApplicantStackGreenhouse
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0ApplicantStack ranked higher
0Greenhouse ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | ApplicantStack | Greenhouse |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | $29.99 / mo | Contact sales |
| Free plan | No · 14-day trial | No |
| Deployment | Online, with no software installation required | — |
| Compliance | — | SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001:2022, ISO 27701:2019, ISO 42001:2023, GDPR, CCPA/CPRA, PCI DSS |
| Support | Support staff during standard business hours, Online help center, getting started guides and videos, Curated knowledge base | — |
| Founded | — | 2012 |
| Headquarters | — | New York City, NY, United States |
| Employees | — | 501–1,000 |
| Funding | — | Series D · $110M raised |
| Best for | Small and mid-sized businesses, including start-ups and organizations with low-volume hiring needs | Employers that want structured, automated hiring across sourcing, interviews and the ATS, from early-stage companies to global enterprises |
Plans side by side
ApplicantStack
Starter$29.99per month
Growth$49.99per month
Recruit$109.99per month
Bundle$159.99per month
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
ApplicantStack
- Budget-friendly entry-level pricing
- Discounted annual prepayment option
Greenhouse
- Strong structured hiring and interview scorecards
- Strong reporting and data visibility
- Top ratings and popularity for enterprise and mid-market recruiting
- Integration ecosystem and unified data
- Reduces hiring bias and supports compliance
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “ApplicantStack vs Greenhouse”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/applicantstack-vs-greenhouse, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.