AshbyAll-in-one recruiting software for ambitious teams
vs
TestGorillaFind great talent. Prove they can do the job.
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3
Ashby vs TestGorilla
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Ashby is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 17.4 versus 0.6 for TestGorilla.
Choose Ashby if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (17.4 vs 0.6)
- You need SOC 2 Type II coverage
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
- Deep data visibility
Choose TestGorilla if…
- You want a free plan to start
- You need GDPR compliant or SOC 2 Type II compliant coverage
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
- automated sending of tests and automatic score return
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Ashby | TestGorilla |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 17.4% | 0.6% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #7 | #59 |
| Share of voice | 3.8% | 0.4% |
| Mentions this run | 21 | 2 |
| Positive in AI answers | 57% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Ashby 0pp · TestGorilla 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Ashby leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
AshbyTestGorilla
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Ashby ranked higher
0TestGorilla ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Ashby | TestGorilla |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Per seat |
| Entry price | $400 / mo | Free; paid from $74 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud-hosted software as a service on Amazon Web Services, sold on subscription plans | — |
| Integrations | 250+ | — |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II | GDPR compliant, SOC 2 Type II compliant |
| Support | Customer success team | Help center, 24/7 live chat, Email support, Digital onboarding guides |
| Founded | 2018 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, CA, United States | Amsterdam, Netherlands |
| Employees | 201–500 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Series D · $120M raised | Series A · $80M raised |
| Best for | Ambitious, scaling companies from startups to enterprises that want one system for hiring | Small companies with limited hiring needs (Core plan) and larger teams screening candidates at scale (Plus plan). |
Plans side by side
Ashby
All-In-One Foundations$400month
All-In-One PlusCustomcontact sales
All-In-One EnterpriseCustomcontact sales
Ashby AnalyticsCustomusage-based
TestGorilla
Gorilla Sourcing Free$0month
Gorilla Sourcing Core$74per Sourcing seat per month, billed annually
Gorilla Sourcing Plus$134per Sourcing seat per month, billed annually
Gorilla Assessments Free$0month
Gorilla Assessments Core$215per account per month, billed annually (from)
Gorilla Assessments Plus$520per account per month, billed annually (from)
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Ashby
- Deep data visibility
- Advanced analytics and detailed funnel reporting
- Strong fit for well-funded, scaling tech startups
- Good for data-driven recruiting teams
- Strong shortlist choice for recruiting software
TestGorilla
- automated sending of tests and automatic score return
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Ashby vs TestGorilla”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/ashby-vs-testgorilla, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.