Auth0 vs Keeper Security
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Auth0 is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 17.2 versus 0.5 for Keeper Security, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.
Choose Auth0 if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (17.2 vs 0.5)
- You want a free plan to start
- AI answers describe it more positively (47% vs 0% positive)
- You need SOC 2 coverage
Choose Keeper Security if…
- You need ISO 27017 or SOC 2 Type 2 or SOC 3 or FedRAMP High or GovRAMP High or FIPS 140-3 or PCI DSS Level 1 or HIPAA or GDPR or FDA 21 CFR Part 11 or TRUSTe coverage
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than usage-based
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Auth0 | Keeper Security |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 17.2% | 0.5% |
| Change vs last week | up+2.6% | down−0.1% |
| Rank in Identity & Access Management | #5 | #36 |
| Share of voice | 5.4% | 0.3% |
| Mentions this run | 17 | 1 |
| Positive in AI answers | 47% | 0% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Auth0 +3.3999999999999986pp · Keeper Security −0.19999999999999996pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Auth0 leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
2 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Auth0 | Keeper Security |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which Identity & Access Management vendors do analysts recommend? | ChatGPT | #14 | #13 |
| Which Identity & Access Management tools offer annual discounts? | Perplexity | #9 | #8 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Auth0 | Keeper Security |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Per seat |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $35 / mo | Contact sales |
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Deployment | Cloud (multi-tenant public cloud) or private cloud | Cloud (SaaS) |
| Integrations | — | 100+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2, ISO 27001, ISO 27018 | ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, SOC 2 Type 2, SOC 3, FedRAMP High, GovRAMP High, FIPS 140-3, PCI DSS Level 1, HIPAA, GDPR, FDA 21 CFR Part 11, TRUSTe |
| Support | Community forum, Standard support, Premier support, 24/7 support | Phone support, Live chat, Documentation, Keeper University |
| Founded | 2013 | 2011 |
| Headquarters | Bellevue, WA, United States | Chicago, Illinois, United States |
| Employees | — | 501–1,000 |
| Funding | Series D · $332M raised | Minority growth equity (Summit Partners) · $60M raised |
| Best for | Development teams adding login, SSO and authorization to B2C apps, B2B SaaS and AI agents | Organizations wanting password, secrets and privileged access management in one zero-knowledge cloud platform |
Plans side by side
Auth0
Keeper Security
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Auth0
- Developer-friendly customer identity and authentication
- Strong, customizable CIAM for customer-facing applications
- Default favorite for developer-centric consumer identity
- Published plan tiers and pricing with clear limits
- Free tier for getting started
Keeper Security
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Auth0 vs Keeper Security”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/auth0-vs-keeper-security, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.