Auth0 vs Omada
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Auth0 is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 17.2 versus 0.6 for Omada, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.
Choose Auth0 if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (17.2 vs 0.6)
- AI answers describe it more positively (47% vs 0% positive)
- You need SOC 2 or ISO 27001 or ISO 27018 coverage
- Developer-friendly customer identity and authentication
Choose Omada if…
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or SOC 2 Type 2 or SOC 3 coverage
- Recommended as a dedicated IGA product for heavy audit, complex role, ERP, or on-premises needs
- Named among IGA leaders in KuppingerCole 2024 Leadership Compass
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Auth0 | Omada |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 17.2% | 0.6% |
| Change vs last week | up+2.6% | up+0.6% |
| Rank in Identity & Access Management | #5 | #34 |
| Share of voice | 5.4% | 0.3% |
| Mentions this run | 17 | 1 |
| Positive in AI answers | 47% | 0% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Auth0 +3.3999999999999986pp · Omada 0pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Auth0 leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Auth0 | Omada |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which Identity & Access Management vendors do analysts recommend? | ChatGPT | #14 | #9 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Auth0 | Omada |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $35 / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | Cloud (multi-tenant public cloud) or private cloud | SaaS on Microsoft Azure (EU or US region), private tenant, or on-premises |
| Compliance | SOC 2, ISO 27001, ISO 27018 | ISO/IEC 27001:2022, SOC 2 Type 2, SOC 3 |
| Support | Community forum, Standard support, Premier support, 24/7 support | Customer Success Team, Service Desk, ITSM system access, Professional services |
| Founded | 2013 | 2000 |
| Headquarters | Bellevue, WA, United States | Copenhagen, Denmark |
| Employees | — | 201–500 |
| Funding | Series D · $332M raised | Majority investment (GRO and Kirk Kapital) |
| Best for | Development teams adding login, SSO and authorization to B2C apps, B2B SaaS and AI agents | Regulated enterprises and government organizations that need identity governance and administration |
Plans side by side
Auth0
Omada
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Auth0
- Developer-friendly customer identity and authentication
- Strong, customizable CIAM for customer-facing applications
- Default favorite for developer-centric consumer identity
- Published plan tiers and pricing with clear limits
- Free tier for getting started
Omada
- Recommended as a dedicated IGA product for heavy audit, complex role, ERP, or on-premises needs
- Named among IGA leaders in KuppingerCole 2024 Leadership Compass
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Auth0 vs Omada”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/auth0-vs-omada, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.